I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: parasaurolophus is the choice dino

So the shareholders are aiming to funnel some of that 56bn into their pockets?

Make it unobtrusive. Otherwise reconsider

And then they find atire

Ew

It’s Avogadro’s constant. The number of carbon atoms in 12 grams of carbon.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avogadro_constant

So… Quake?

Yes. Although at least you will both be aware that you are using different systems

deleted by creator

I’m not sure if I fully understand.
I was thinking, wouldn’t it be easiest to describe the system you use by taking the last number in your first decimum and then saying you increment it with one?
E.g. for base ten this would be: base 9 + 1
For binary it would be: base 1 + 1
For hexadecimal it would be: base F + 1
Etc.

All your base are belong to 10

Wouldn’t a vpn solve this?

Insert joke about poor quality of last couple of ablums

Brush your teeth and floss

Except if you want to do good science. Good scientists will identify false confidence and will aim to steer well clear of it

No
The gene therapy is applied locally. They operate on the ear to enable access to the relevant tissue and then apply the therapy. So it should only affect cells in the ear.
Additionally, it is unclear to me whether the therapeutic gene is integrated into the genome. It might not be.
For transmission to offspring, you would need to edit germ line cells (sex cells) and you would need to integrate the gene into the genome.

Great achievement. Not much on the tech though. According to the ucam press release, they used an AAV1 viral delivery system. Given that the therapy is permanent, I would expect integration of the therapeutic gene into the patient’s genome (in the targeted tissue). Anyone have more on this?

https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/baby-born-deaf-can-hear-after-breakthrough-gene-therapy

Edit: I think this patent may be relevant
https://www.patentsencyclopedia.com/app/20130095071

No less sensible than all the others at least

Ah good to hear

… While continuing to use and build car-centric infrastructure?