Will make the refugee camps look like paradise.

Hadn’t read the actual letter. It would be interesting to know what the specific request they have is.

“Thierry Breton, the European commissioner for the internal market, said in a letter addressed to Musk on Tuesday that his office has “indications” that groups are spreading misinformation and “violent and terrorist” content on X, and urged the billionaire to respond within a 24-hour period.”

Sounds like it’s just a strongly worded letter.

I feel like if Gnome Shell is crashing enough for this to be a problem then it crashing is the actual problem.

These guys could have just bottled tap water with some standard treatment and would have been fine.

I think point is without the cast body section you could just replace broken parts which may be significantly less. In practice though I don’t think it matters that much. Small accidents hopefully don’t damage the frame and if they do it’s often a bit dubious repairing it.

Do people not keep the same number when they change phone companies?

Pretty sure they were gunning for insurance fraud.

There are slot limits that regulate that. This is just a policy to benefit domestic airlines while encouraging flights to airports other than Sydney and Melbourne.

This more because of the local planning in a lot of western countries. Authoritarian countries force housing through much easier

Nafta has restrictions around worker pay. Overall though it might be bad for auto workers in the US but much more beneficial to the average American.

They probably only had margarine croissants left.

Controlling the natural resources a country and leasing it out it private companies is pretty standard practice in most non corrupt countries. Norway probably differs in that they capture more of the economic rent in part due to a more efficient tax and a share of public ownership.

It’s also pretty evident that we could not sustain the current population on preindustrial farming let alone hunter gathering.

Yeah you aren’t wrong there. Figuring our a way to placated those groups is required to get it to be implemented.

Yeah nope. You have to understand the reason deductions exists for income tax is that they allow you to deduct your costs from the revenue you take in and are only paying tax on the profit.

Edit: I should add plenty of places that do have land taxes usually have a lot of exemptions like here, your primary residence is exempted as well as any land for primary production (land used for agriculture) but those exist for political reasons.

Not necessarily the first as long as it’s done in land efficient way and the second if they are unwilling to move but otherwise yes.

It really depends on where the land is as it’s based on value. If you are talking about replacing property taxes with land value taxes typically it’s just a rate on the value but in this case it’s just the land value so a higher rate but only applies to land. If you could figure out the total land value in your neighbourhood you could figure it out.

As for who is affected, single family homes on the outskirts probably see a drop in taxes while those in the inner city and vacant plots see a large increase.

I think you are implying there’s deductions against land value tax but there typically isn’t.

No one is actually burying trees. What happens is that after the contract ends they can just cut down the trees, release the carbon and start again.

I do agree with better regulation but forrestry ones should just go.