Not only capitalism entirely based on the hierarchy of ownership, but it also reinforces already existing social hierarchies as those in power receive more profits and capital, and thus more power and influence in a broader society. You cannot say hierarchy is bad and be pro capitalism. Leftist ideologies are ways to try to democratize the economy, which flattens hierarchy. Anarchism is inherently anti capitalist.

Communism is not dictatorship Capitalism is not democracy

A lot of the people exiled from communist countries were the ones doing slavery and fucking over the working class max

I got a raise at mŭ job!

Or Nb6+

You can google it. She’s said on numerous occasions and in many many social media posts that he abused her

Why tf would anyone run a random shell script on their machine? You don’t even need an RCE anymore you just need a dumb ass on social media.

If someone owns land with the intent of exploiting labor for profit that land is private property.

If they buy a gun to keep people off that property and personally patrol it to ensure that’s property’s safely they are protecting private property.

If they do it without the use of a government or a governing agency they are protecting private property without a government.

Therefore it is possible to protect private property without a government.

If you can’t comprehend that, you’re a moron. You don’t need a central government to protect private property, you just need violence, albeit the correct form of violence. Next time do some reading and learn a few things before you try to correct someone.

So like I said earlier, a dude with a gun can protect private property.

An idiot with a gun can protect private property. If someone owns land that they own for the sake of generating profit, ie private property, and they protect it by grabbing a gun to keep people off of it, that is literally using a gun to protect private property. Saying that that situation is impossible is fucking moronic. I’ve never seen someone so confidently incorrect.

It’s ok man. Reading is hard. There was no distractions or posturing. Go reread the last comment and try your best to reply to bullet point number 3. Come to terms that you were wrong and move on. You just look like a dumbass

1. I’m not a liberal you dumbass
2. Everyone knows the difference between private and personal property
3. You absolutely can protect private property without a government. If someone ownes a factory, or extra houses for rent, or access to a natural resource like water, or even infrastructure, and someone else rightfully tries to take it from them, and they patrol it with a gun to defend it, is that somehow using a government? No? Then shut the fuck up you breaindead fucking donkey.

You are wrong. Literally just objectively wrong. Stop showing your ass. Go read some therory and maybe some history. Governments has never been the only way to protect private property. Private militias, private security forces, and other forms of non government violence have always been used.

Jesus Christ, I’m not bad at logic, you’re just an idiot. A really really confident idiot.

Violence is needed to protect private property.

Government is useful for protecting private property. This is because governments are inherently violent.

Does this mean that governments are the only way of protecting private property? Absolutely not. A dude with a gun can protect private property.

Does this mean that all forms of violence are useful for protecting private property? Absolutely not. But again, a dude with a gun can do a fine job protecting private property.

I’m not trying to debate you man, you’re an annoying debate lord, for the love of Christ fuck off.

I’m a bisexual black guy. All of the slurs lol

Unpopular opinion but ubuntu.

You will eventually run into an error you have never seen before and and someone using ubuntu has already solved it and posted it online somewhere.

Government is top down.

How is that any different with capitalism now? The state just legitimizes that, it doesn’t stop anything. Private property and the state need to go.

Again, no one said that. All I said was that violence was needed for protecting private property. Not that all forms of violence is useful for it.

Defend myself? I’m not sure I get your point.

I agree with you there. My point is that a government is not needed to have private property. Governments are inherently violent, but you can be violent without a government.

You don’t need a government, you just need violence

Nah but When the workers do it will be.

What’s the other option? Continue to be fucked by a system the privatizes everything and destroys our environment? Continue to be fucked harder by the billionaire class?