• 0 Posts
  • 32 Comments
Joined 34 years ago
cake
Cake day: October 1st, 1990

help-circle
  • I did, yes. The second link has the relevant quote from the CFO - “We’re probably – you know, maybe we cried too much last year when we were hitting numbers that were 3.5% of sales”.

    Though looking at the context, it looks like he regrets the actions (specifically increased security hired) that came from that. There doesn’t seem to be anything about the link to store closures.

    The actual link came from an article Shepard Pie below you provided here (Is Shoplifting Really Surging?). Apparently nationwide, shoplifting is down - except in certain cities

    But the increase in shoplifting appears to be limited to a few cities, rather than being truly national. […] There are some exceptions, particularly New York City, where shoplifting has spiked.

    Out of the 24 cities, 17 reported decreases in shoplifting.

    I’m guessing the 7 remaining cities are where the stores were closed.






  • speff@disc.0x-ia.moetoOpen Source@lemmy.mlKeep out, f**ker
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Just…ignore him. He’s an attention-removed - this is what they do to stay relevant. Downvote articles/comments talking about him. Don’t give these sites traffic, stop saying his name, and stop mentioning his sites and his stupidness.

    Just stop feeding the attention removed.









  • No way… people who are experts in the food/health industry are involved with giving dietary advice? The horror.

    Of course there isn’t a link to the reports, so I have to go looking for it. Anyway here’s the report. PDF - page 8 for the results. I spot-checked a few of them - the conflicts of interest I saw was in the form of companies sponsoring research done. …which is pretty much how the majority of research gets done I believe…

    Also I see coca-cola referenced ONCE as a “possible” COI

    Position in industry-sponsored conferences: Dr. Booth was selected to speak at a conference sponsored by Bayer, Coca-Cola, and Abbott, among other industry actors

    yet this article seems to deem it alright to put it as the posterboy image and list it prominently among other unpopular company names. Also they have to link to their boogeyman reporting about aspartame. You can see where HN tore it apart here.

    This is why I hate news nowadays. I could’ve made some good food in the past 20 minutes on a nice Saturday, but instead I wasted time finding out a guardian article was bullshit.






  • No. This is the relevant section in your link -

    Environmental advocates say structures will run through public lands, habitats of endangered plants and animal species like the ocelot, a spotted wild cat.

    “A plan to build a wall through will bulldoze an impermeable barrier straight through the heart of that habitat. It will stop wildlife migrations dead in their tracks. It will destroy a huge amount of wildlife refuge land. And it’s a horrific step backwards for the borderlands,” Laiken Jordahl, a southwest conservation advocate for the Center for Biological Diversity, said Wednesday afternoon.

    This is no different than linking to your original source. AP isn’t claiming it’s going through the refuge. AP is stating that the environmentalists are saying it will. There’s a difference