Where is the guy who thinks we shouldn’t be sending war money to Israel, Palestine, OR Ukraine?
Where is the guy who thinks we shouldn’t be sending war money to Israel, Palestine, OR Ukraine?
I never got the without lube thing. That’s painful for both of us. Is there a way to make it painful just for the other person, but not for me?
Narrated by a text to speech voice? With broken English grammar that was clearly written by somebody in Russia or China? I love those videos.
You’re sharing your privilege and ensuring upward mobility for future generations of POCs
Are we just gonna ignore the part about using his company’s money to pay for it?
(Far as I care, that’s between him and the company though. If that’s how they want to spend their money, more power to them)
So instead of being fooled by fake and misleading headlines written by journalists, you can get fooled by fake and misleading headlines written by Twitter users? If you insist on not reading the article, I’m not sure one of those is worse than the other.
Highligher memes are better than no memes.
Is this really much less usable for screen reader users than anybody else?
The sighted user sees the tweet, “check this out!” And a BBC banner but no other information about the link.
The screen reader user hears the tweet, “check this out!” And hears that there is a link.
I guess the image provides a tiny bit more context that the mystery link goes to the BBC, but that ‘s not a ton more.
X should do away with the images too.
I guess if you’re stupid enough to buy a dental plan based on Tom Hanks’s recommendation, you’re also dumb enough to think Tom Hanks still looks that young.
I am accusing the cisgender men at the conference of lying about their gender
Wait, this is confusing. Cisgender man would mean they identify as men. But if they were lying about their gender… are you accusing them of secretly being women?
If recruiters are trying to discriminate, and you have the attributes they’re discriminating in favor of, getting a face-to-face with them can be a way to get your foot in the door that doesn’t leave a paper trail.
Which really highlights how bad the job market is now. All the recruiters at this job fair are going to share the sentiments the organizers are expressing in this article. They’re there to hire women and are pissed at all the men who showed up, so significantly less likely to hire them… but those dudes are so desperate they still gave it a shot.
Organizers expressed frustration. Past iterations of the conference have “always felt safe and loving and embracing,” said Bo Young Lee, president of advisory at AnitaB.org, in a LinkedIn post. “And this year, I must admit, I didn’t feel this way.”
“This group was really accepting until all these unacceptable people showed up”
Software engineer.
Understand requirements even when they’re not communicated clearly (or when you have to guess and make them up yourself)
Tell an idiot they’re wrong without telling them they’re an idiot.
Write code other people can maintain.
because of AI
Oh look, a bullshit article.
You need to learn the fundamentals of how things work, and how to apply those fundamentals, not rote specifics of a particular technology.
Since you’re Gen Z, it sounds like you may also be relatively new in your career, and this strikes me as a timeless problem of experience.
Young people come in with a fresh set of eyes and say “why don’t we just do X?” Then more experienced people know all the unfortunate reasons why it’s not that easy. Like in your example, it’s arguably a better policy to just run every patch that gets released, even if it’s not applicable. The alternative is to spend some amount of man hours evaluating whether each patch is needed or not; and occasionally dealing with the consequences of somebody mis-identifying a critical patch and deciding not to install it. The cost from that is greater than the cost of occasionally having to clean up a bad patch that breaks something.
I do agree that Gen Z seems to feel a greater sense of unfairness when they (as less experienced employees) get stuck doing more of the grunt work in a situation like that. I’ve had several issues with Gen Zers at my company feeling like they’re supposed to be working on bigger and better things than the entry level tasks we’re giving them, and becoming disgruntled about it.
Not really sure what to do to manage around that part of the problem though. With millennials in that position, I had reasonable success by giving them a bigger project, then reviewing it thoroughly and helping them see the areas they needed to improve in. The Gen Z’s I’ve tried that tactic with have then felt like they were being “picked on” any time they got critical feedback. I haven’t had it happen enough to know if that’s a generational thing or just those specific people though.
Have you asked these unhappy employees? You’ll probably get a more helpful answer if it comes from somebody familiar with the specifics of your job / company. If you’re not doing exit interviews (or not setting a tone where they feel they can be honest in the exit interview), you’re doing yourself a disfavor.
They keep trying to go to Mars. There’s a reason I left the place!
I live in a state that has sales tax, right on the border with a state that does not, so for more expensive electronics etc, I’ll drive to a store to pick them up.
I just set up a PO Box today though, so I can ship stuff now too.
Wasn’t that the hate group on Babylon 5?