samick1

Some companies have to enforce retention policies for business and/or legal reasons, which means they actually have to delete your data if they say they will.

Some sites only “soft” delete things because it’s simply easier and cheaper.

Regardless, I can’t reiterate what you said enough:

It’s why they say everything is permanent on the internet.

Nobody should ever once in their life assume that data they post online will be discarded, ever. Maybe it will, but never assume it will. Even if you run the server yourself and delete the data files on your server and send the hard disks into the sun, if the data was ever accessed, you should treat it as if it’s been captured and retained somewhere.

She’s certainly an intelligence threat.

It’s like watching people drill holes in a sinking boat to let the water out.

I don’t generally care if another human “coincidentally discovers” otherwise personal things about me. I think almost everyone has “information” they want kept private, like pin numbers or passwords.

In general I prefer to stay as private as possible because a) I don’t actually know what my data could be leveraged for, neither today nor decades down the road, and b) privacy is a one-way street - data is private and anonymous until it’s not, and then it never is, ever again.

For instance I don’t feel a third party should be able to access my health records without my explicit permission for the purposes of denying e.g. employment, insurance or some other service or benefit. My country has laws in place to protect my health records but that could change at any time. Also people don’t always follow laws, and the Internet is worldwide, not nationwide.

I also care about privacy as a consequence of liberty. I love that it’s your choice not to be private, and I feel very strongly it should be a choice. You should never be compelled to reveal information you want kept private unless it’s absolutely necessary to protect the rights of others. For instance a murder suspect, in a case where a sufficient legal standard has been reached, should be compelled to provide relevant evidence for the purposes of solving the case.

Today in “Stunning Failures of Leadership”.

It’s amazing that he holds the title of “CEO” of a company I actually recognize.

His answers were scripted? They were terrible. My theory was that he could have scripted them ahead of time but instead he blew it off and winged it.

I mean I could have scripted better answers than that.