Are you looking for a space to specifically discuss asexuality, or a space about general things minus references to sex?
Are you looking for a space to specifically discuss asexuality, or a space about general things minus references to sex?
I do both depending on level of detail in general. If every tree and trash can is marked and the roads have odd geometries, then clearly defining a residential area to be inside a block works best imho. But if there’s a big area without many other features I just map it as a big residential area until more detail is added. Area nodes should never share nodes with road nodes though.
You can have Albertus, there are several digitalizations, and some clones like Flareserif 821.
Norway is a rich country so the government can help people buy electric instead of gasoline cars. Of course, they got rich by selling oil, but yes.
It’s more that changes can be made with coordination across the OS, with a shared vision and goal. Linux distros are primarily integration projects, putting together the components from other peoples projects. BSDs are in control of the base OS project as one coherent project.
I see what you mean now. I thought you meant as in upstream/downstream.
Tumbleweed is not a derivative of Leap.
“The discussion continued for quite a while without making much headway.”
I think Debian is interesting, being such a large project of collaboration. I want this democratic, volunteer, non-corporate backed, free project to show that 10000 eyes make bugs shallow. I wish this model produced new ways of doing things, bringing people together in the spirit of creativity and playful productivity.
I’ve used Debian in different ways for around 15 years now, and I really want it to succeed.
Having said that, there is a “but…” looming in the back of my mind. But… it’s difficult to ignore that other distributions are the ones pushing Linux forward. The innovation from Fedora and the distributions still called OpenSuse explore new areas which become the standards.
This is not criticism of Debian, I just wonder if we humans are capable of collaborating freely at that level without some top-down force directing work forward, or if we are bound to being one step behind, always trying to catch up to what others have already done?
Are we actually converting people or is the desktop platform just less popular for other OSs in favor of phones etc?
Debian + Flatpaks has been very reliable to me.
Usually roads have lots of gps tracks, so you can adjust the image offsets to match the gps tracks.
Is that Albrecht Dürers signature?
The last time my grub was broken was around 2012 when I ran Arch. After that I have rarely thought about grub at all.
When it feels too much, I go back to the building where I live, and set small but realistic goals. Like, I want this block to be complete with all the questions. Then I look around and add things that aren’t in the map yet, until my block is as close to complete as I can get it. An island of perfect mapping surrounded by more incomplete mapping. Only then I move on to another well defined area, preferably close to home. Maybe other people will see this example of good mapping and think “I could do that with my local area too!” My personal opinion is that OSM needs many local experts, rather than a few overwhelmed people trying to do it all for everyone else. I have my eyes on where I live, and notice changes over time.
Iirc, you can deselect road surfaces in the settings somewhere so the app doesn’t ask about it?
Fedora/Redhat is a good example. It could be argued that the Linux distro scene was different 23 years ago, making it harder to be seen today.
The thing I’m pondering is what the openSUSE community actually is. Does it exist as a group, or is it separate projects, each doing their own thing… for who? What is the overlap between people in the various distros, overlap in technology used in packaging and QA etc? Is it meaningful to talk about openSUSE as a distinct community separate from SUSE?
I’m not sure. A few years ago I remember that OpenBSD expected ASCII for files, but I think Linux expects utf-8. I could be wrong though.
Unicode in filenames can be a bad idea, since there are more than one way to achieve what looks like the same character. So matching patterns could fail if you think it’s one way, but it’s actually another representation in unicode.
gnuplot surprisingly also has a strange license, containing “Permission to modify the software is granted, but not the right to distribute the complete modified source code.”