Without experienced legal counsel, facts, science, and emotions could rapidly begin to make sense.

So true.

Amazing article, thank you. Sets out clearly how we got here and what is at stake.

[Tire sales] are growing a little faster than the population, but still slower than the GDP [sad tire manufacturer noises]

Why should sales in a static (and resource intense and polluting) technology like tires grow faster than the population? Making money off the stock market seems kind of evil

EVs are still part of the solution, though. Not spilling gas all day long on every corner of the city would be a big deal.

This was my question, too https://sh.itjust.works/comment/11976255

I hope they like old people

Thanks, I understand the problem with using memory after it’s been freed and possibly access it changed by another part of the process. I guess I was confused by the double free explanation I read, which didn’t really say how it could be exploited, but I think you are right it still needs to be accessed later by the original program, which would not happen in Rust.

Thank you, that is very clear.

The way I understand it, it is a bug in C implementation of free() that causes it to do something weird when you call it twice on the same memory. Maybe In Rust you can never call free twice, so you would never come across this bug. But, also Rust probably doesn’t have the same bug.

My point is it seems it is a bug in the underlying implementation of free(), not to be caught by the compiler, and can’t Rust have such errors no matter its superior design?

My Android keyboard will automatically capitalize lots of common words like target, guess, even-- shit it’s not doing it now, it heard me thinking. I guess it’s brands, but some of them I don’t recognize. I’m going to be mad if it starts doing it again as soon as I leave this thread.

Captain drives from the stern, though. If you sit up in bed you’re facing the bow.

I don’t know what this is about, but it reminds me of the constant ev-bashing in most major newspapers over the last two decades (since the beginning). I believe it’s oil money in the press, and definitely had effect on the overall conversation, especially discouraging small evs, but not clear effect on policy. It just keeps consumers from adopting.

On reading more about it, I realize you are right that they were/are rarely paid by journals, but it used to be a prestigious part of your academic career, so it fit in as a normal and valued part of your research work, while being paid by their university or institute or whatever.

In fact, there are platforms that allow authors to pay to have their articles reviewed, but this is felt to be not gaining traction because the researchers’ bosses consider it moonlighting instead of an essential part of the common work of advancing scientific knowledge.

I know in the 2000s my research advisor asked us to analyze papers and replicate methods and measurements from other groups on occasion, sometimes because he was a reviewer and sometimes just because it developed specialized skills in our field. We (and he) only worked so many hours each week, regardless it was research or review, and were paid a stipend/salary so we were all definitely getting paid for our time. The key was that the university “allowed” us to spend time on this sort of community service/professional development, by which I don’t mean they really closely accounted for anything, but just didn’t have a breakneck publish or perish vibe.

This is what the publishers (the peer reviewed journals) used to do, right? I thought they got other research teams to comment on papers and even try duplicating some kinds of experiments before publication. Maybe that’s just within certain disciplines? Maybe I’m nuts.

They say “soldiers” for sympathy but it’s the politicians who are rightfully scared.

All they need is a third developer to divide up the project for them and design the interfaces

So much “if we can just ignore atrocity a little longer we can break through to a new reality where there is one fewer problem.” Magical thinking at it’s worst.

They should have one for heterosexuality, too, if it’s all about tastes.

My phone camera has the option to save and view the raw file as well as the processed jpeg, and when you do that you can see that the software is doing a lot of work by default to sharpen and add contrast and color enhancement. My guess is the selfie camera may be tuned to reduce redness in particular to smooth skin tones? Or it’s just a smaller sensor not collecting as much color info to begin with.

It helps make sure it’s absorbed so you don’t have to pee right away. If you’ve just eaten you don’t have to

Just as a quick hope-it-works because it’s easy, try drinking a glass of water with just a tiny amount of sugar and salt (like literally you should not be able to taste it, should just taste slightly fishy) before your nap.

I’m with the others on seeing a therapist, though, and first-round antidepressants have had huge positive effects in my personal experience, so it’s not necessarily going to be this long mind warping journey that I think people are scared to start sometimes.