![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/2QNz7bkA1V.png)
I hate that my government (Sweden) is a driving force behind this.
I hate that my government (Sweden) is a driving force behind this.
Pick a small bug or feature from the backlog and fix it. First iteration of a fix is probably shoehorned in there, then I try to adapt the fix to the code base. Matching the style and design of the code base is more important than my own preferences.
I’m a learn by doing kind of person.
No thanks
Why keep using a platform when it no longer tries to adhere to your needs?
You are right, I didn’t think of MBR.
It was possible for Ubuntu once upon a time
Odd choice to use Android 11 on one of them and Android 14 on the other. Makes me suspicious of their ability to keep these devices up to date over time.
Yes, unstable Debian is still hella stable. But you probably don’t want to suggest it as the first Linux dust since you need some extra carefulness when updating.
This is enough for most projects.
I agree with this but I suspect that a lot of the backend is dependent on other in-house infrastructure so it’s not as easy as most people think.
Try Rdx, it’s great for read access to Reddit.
More info in the GitHub repo.
I wonder if I can trick my father into replacing Facebook with this.
Now my 1000/1000 for 429 SEK (about 40$) doesn’t sound as good. At least the candy is cheaper here in Sweden.
You don’t have to carry a huge amount of rocket fuel so I assume that the energy requirement would be less. But this is just a laymens guess.
When a colleague generated a dia graph for each git object that got created when he made a few commits. Understanding the underlying data model was a real aha moment. 13 years later and I’m still grateful for his “mini git course”.
We have well established ways to deal with secrets. Also, everyone is responsible enough to not self approve changes where they do things they are uncertain of.
We very seldom resort to self approvals. Everyone in the team see code reviews as important. But also that progress trumps code review.
Who said anything about only requiring 1 reviewer? And no, I did not drop an /s. You should try working for a healthy team where everyone takes collective responsibility and where the teams progress is more important than any one person’s progress.
We decided that everyone in the team is allowed to approve changes. If no one has reviewed your change within 24 hours you are allowed to approve it yourself. It will usually come up in the daily sync that a self approval is imminent, which usually leads to someone taking a look.
I try to follow Bash strict mode. It can protect you from some foot shooting.