I’ve refused to use Adobe for a while because of their bullshit. Their main product I care about is Lightroom, but Darktable is a perfectly fine replacement for it

No they’re not, genius

Porn or sex addiction isn’t a thing. In general, people who struggle with porn or sex are living in social environments that have pathologized them, and the struggle is in trying to conform to social expectations that make normal human experiences taboo.

2

No you haven’t

It’s that they’re fucking, isn’t it

Capitalism doesn’t require rational behavior; all it requires is a system that allows some people to make passive income by exploiting other people, based on the idea of private property. CEOs, for example, don’t care about what’s good for the business; they care about extracting as much value from the business and the workers as they can get away with before moving on to the next victim.

Sure, fascists probably would be terrified about a movie that’s “aware of social injustices and systems of oppression”. They should be.

Most pollution from cars comes from the tires, not the gas burning. If you drive any car at all, you’re the problem

Boosting liberally on Mastodon is encouraged bc that’s the only way posts get exposure without an algorithm. I boost every post I see as long as it isn’t offensive or low quality.

That’s a straw man, because in this case they weren’t under genocidal siege by the state it is internationally recognized to be a part of

No one with any sense believes that bullshit any more

This is the 5% people are talking about when they say “95% of police ruin it for the other 5%”

No, I’m calling communists what they are: fascists. You extrapolated the rest in your head and argued against it, i.e. a straw man. Dialectics at its finest

1. straw man, bc I never claimed double genocide, and 2) just bc double genocide can be used by Nazis doesn’t mean it isn’t true. Dialectics has really rotted your brain, comrade

Shocking; redfash tries to silence their critics by accusing them of antisemitism with no justification or support whatsoever. Typical red herring from someone who has no real argument.

I have no interest in sounding reasonable to redfash

Stop gatekeeping dialectics, tankie

It doesn’t matter what Einstein thought about Lenin; if he had a good argument for Lenin being a good guy, that argument would stand on its own, and the content (that’s “material conditions” in redfash-speak) of that argument should be discussed. Additionally, it’s not necessary for me to offer a counter-narrative to point out a logical fallacy; that’s shifting the burden of proof, another fallacy.

lol still doubling down on your irrationality. There are some contradictions, but a dialectical analysis shows that being irrational is, in fact, progressive; am I right, comrade?