Keep in mind both LibreWolf and Mull are very slow because LibreWolf disabled WebGL, enabling higher privacy features, and Mull disabled JIT, a massive performance hit.

This is for people who don’t know then blaming Firefox being slow, LibreWolf and Mull are slower version of Firefox, just that.

This useless feature for what ? They implemented this because Google forcing them to do so I guess.

Reinstalling is waste of time, just let you know because the settings are kept, so nothing changes, issues remain.

Just create new profile.

Forks are pretty valuable to Firefox development, and it’s helpful for Firefox marketshare too because they use the same UA as Firefox, so website must support Firefox.

Even Firefox devs said they observe Firefox forks to see their idea and bring back to Firefox, just compare recent new features of Firefox to Zen/Floorp, you would see that the idea of:

• Profile Manager is from Zen/Floorp
• Vertical Tab is from Zen/Floorp
• Sidebar is from Zen/Floorp

And many small things.

There’s many users who would kill to have this feature from Arc, just let you know. It’s innovative, that’s why it should be an option for people who want it, it needs to be polished though, like not popping on no audio videos and a soft-whitelist.

Can this poll be considered official ? I clicked the link and it looks like a Twitter poll or something.

It does, enable Desktop Mode and install

Yep, waiting for this feature so userChrome.js cook-ers can turn it into Tree Style Tab Group like Sidebery, with this config exposed it would be surprised if it takes long for us users to try the test version.

Smart Tab Group is pretty hype too.

Yep, people have benchmarked:

• Firefox without any Dark Mode addon = 27 points Speedometer
• With Dark Reader = about 11 points
• With UltimaDark = 25-26 points