I do, friend. I do.

This is another one of those situations where for them (and every other company with access to similar content) the upside is just too much money to ignore.

What is the downside? Lost customers? No problem, they’ll charge the remaining customers more for new premium features based on the newly trained models. Also if they didn’t develop those features in the first place, a competitor would have pulled away customers anyways.

Fines from some government for the egregious violation of a TBD law relating to AI that doesn’t even exist yet? Lol, just the cost of business.

And policy changes? Who actually believes they’ll discard the model parameters they’ve already spent presumably millions of dollars training?

Right? I was too lazy to double check, but yeah, the original claim seems absurd considering it’s missing at least the top 5 most populated countries representing nearly 4 billion people.

Would anything have prevented an increase in rates? I’d bet if everyone got out of line, the rate increases would have been the same or higher. The only difference would be no one received $100.

Only those who could lift more than average survived for the photo, obviously.

I haven’t pumped gas in 3 years and it’s glorious.

Thanks for the clarification and I believe I misunderstood your original comment.

To add to your list there is an often underutilized feature of GitHub for discussions too.

You mean pretty much a single GitHub account?

Also your quick question may have already been asked and answered but difficult to find on Discord. Or if it hasn’t been asked yet, now a future person can’t discover the same question easily. So either way you’re just wasting other people’s time.

The distinction is web workers and offline mode.

It means your PWA can preload everything it needs to run offline, and you can actually use it offline. That is different from a “cached website” which can only cache the pages you’ve already visited and otherwise does not allow you to update data locally.

Yes, although that recently changed in the EU (only) with the Digital Markets Act.

The paper concedes that AI hardware regulation isn’t a silver bullet and doesn’t eliminate the need for regulation in other aspects of the industry.

You can try and control the hardware, or impose other regulations, but at a certain point if a model is trained and released into the wild, nothing will be able to stop its distribution and use.

You’re famous for being photographed shirtless on a horse. Is that because horses can’t judge you, or is it a new Russian policy for reducing laundry costs?

Can someone provide some context here? Why is he screaming at a coach?

Also side note: why is that even vaguely tolerable behavior for a professional sports player / role model?

I recently went through these exact pains trying to contribute to a project that exclusively ran through Discord and eventually had to give up when it was clear they would never enable issues in their GitHub repos for “reasons.”

It was impossible to discover the history behind anything. Even current information was lost within days, having to rehash aspects that were already investigated and decided upon.

Just use merge with informative PR titles, descriptions and linked work items. Reviewing history is then trivial and it has none of the pitfalls for less experienced devs.

0.1mm seems awfully thin for a double edged blade.

It’s also unreasonable to assume they will stack anywhere close to perfectly.

My guess is you’re off by at least a factor of 20.

I was thinking the same, but then realized it’s probably just quiche.

For everyone who didn’t bother reading the (very short) article, it’s in Peachtree Corners, it’s 1 tunnel about 1.5km long and 2m below ground.

The connection allows staff at the city’s “Curiosity Lab” complex to order lunch from some businesses in the connected shopping center.

Conceptually it could make sense to reduce urban traffic from frequent point to point deliveries, but no, this isn’t going to deliver Amazon packages into your living room.

This article has more detailed information on the surveys conducted. It seems to be about a third of US adults.

https://bigthink.com/the-present/was-trump-anointed-by-god/

Interestingly, while skewed heavily towards Republicans, some Democrats also hold this position and a much smaller percentage overall believe he was selected because of his policies.

I see this nutjob has no idea what he’s talking about and cannot fulfill the duties of his oath of office, so he should simply be removed from office, right? Right guys?