deleted by creator

One source is poore nemecek 2018.

another appeal to authority.

you don’t seem to understand how scientific reasoning works and you just want to be right. I understand the cognitive dissonance might have driven you mad. maybe you should just take a break for a little while and come back and read this with fresh eyes when you can take the time to understand why poor nemechek use bad methodology and why it should not have been cited the thousands of times it has been since 2018. it has never been confirmed by a separate study.

the methodology is fucked. read it.

my source is poore nemecek 2018.

I have.

this is an elaborate appeal to authority. use your own reasoning and look at the study.

my source is poore-nemecek 2018

you’re just lying now. we know that cattle are fed silage which is waste and crop seconds.

poore nemecek supports what I’m saying.

the evidence is in the study. read it.

what oped do you think that I read? I read poor nemechek and came to my own conclusion.

the article has been cited but it has never been confirmed. it can’t be because it makes no sense to attribute the weight from pressing soybeans for oil to the livestock industry when the livestock industry is only using the waste.

poor nemechek is easy to refute. read it they attribute the water used to raise cotton for the textile industry as water used to produce beef. the methodology is fucked.

characterizing my claims as absurd is poisoning the well.

I don’t need any sources beyond the ones that I’m refuting. you can read their methodology and see that they’re flawed.

there are literally thousands of pages in the reports you just linked if you can’t show which one you think supports your case I’m not going to be doing all the reading for

arguing with a strawman

that isn’t what I said