🇨🇦🇩🇪🇨🇳张殿李🇨🇳🇩🇪🇨🇦

  • 10 Posts
  • 42 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: November 14th, 2023

help-circle

  • There is technology available now that is truly horrific in its implications should people with sufficient imagination and a whole lotta fucks not to give start putting thought into it. I’ve workshopped a few possibilities with my SO (an electronics engineer). Here’s the two best:

    Example 1: Lazy Dog Drones

    A commercial cargo drone can be picked up for a song and a dance when compared to even a tiny malcontent terrorist cell’s budget. It is trivial to build a metal box with racks that can be opened and emptied by remote control. It is also trivial to manufacture a bunch of lazy dogs to put into said drone’s box. Now you just need a cheap rustbucket pickup truck and a canvas tarpaulin and you’re ready to go.

    Park your truck somewhere without straight line-of-sight surveillance. Uncover your drone in the back. Launch it and fly nap-of-the-earth until you’re a distance away and then go for altitude. Fly to wherever there’s a crowd of people you don’t mind killing and maiming. When overhead (about 30m) and going at full speed, release the lazy dogs. While this is going on you relocate your truck (in case someone saw the launch). Have the drone fly off nap-of-the-earth to land in your truck. Cover the drone with your tarp and leave. Reload with lazy dogs and repeat at will until you’re out or until you’re caught.

    An amazing number of lazy dogs can be held in a box that even a relatively modestly-priced cargo drone can carry with ease. Imagine the carnage one of those would have evoked had the Las Vegas shooter used it instead of relatively ineffectual rifle fire. (Yes, I’m calling the worst mass shooting in American history “relatively ineffectual” by comparison to a single load of lazy dogs.) And even better (from his perspective) he wouldn’t have had to put himself at risk while gleefully slaughtering hundreds.

    Example 2: Laser Blinders

    You can get very strong lasers for under $500. The kind that will blind you in milliseconds if aimed at your eyes. You can buy servo kits that can be controlled by a microcomputer for well under $100. The kinds of microcomputers you’d need for this little toy are fairly pricey, though. About $50. (No, I’m not joking. My SO has a kit with an “SoC”, whatever that is, that is more than capable of pulling off this attack.) Add about another $300 for assorted optics (a camera, some lenses, etc.) and you’re ready to rock.

    This system will be a small turret, in effect, that aims that laser. A camera will be used both to identify targets and to shift the laser’s position around to ensure the target is appropriately struck. In Phase I you decide who your target is and train an AI model (not Degenerative AI but still Deep Learning AI) on that target. You could decide you want to attack white folk, say, or police officers, or politicians, or … I don’t know, street sweepers? … whatever crazy sociopaths want to attack. For professions, you spend some time in advance doing things like scouring police web sites for faces, or have some people in the field taking surreptitious pictures of street sweepers. For racial types, it’s easy to buy image sets that are already nicely categorized for you so you can just go wild. In the end you have training data that will with reasonable accuracy identify your targets. The turret is set up somewhere hard to notice and set to running. It identifies targets based on its training data through the camera, then brings the laser roughly to bear on the target. The laser is fired very briefly—far too quickly for the human eye to detect—at lower power and the camera identifies where the spot was and adjusts the turret. When it’s on target (a process that takes under a second … by far) it fires full strength, destroying the target’s vision (likely cooking the eyes!) before the target can even process what’s going on.

    On a crowded street it can do this with impunity for quite a while before people understand what’s happening around them. And there would be no real escape if you’re one of the targets if the terrorists put up two or three of these turrets to set up a kill zone with no angle uncovered. Dozens, maybe hundreds, of people could wind up horribly blinded and tracing the attack to specific individuals could be fiendishly difficult given that most of the components are off-the-shelf.

    And remember…

    This is technology we have right now. This isn’t some far future thing where we have better and more powerful computers and other technology. One of the reasons I can’t get into cyberpunk gaming is that the world presented is … charmingly backwards compared to what the world is now.


  • Even later here, but I have some experience with PbP and RPOL. Here’s a PMI analysis:

    Plus (good things):

    • The whole game record is there.
    • You have time to think out your actions.
    • In the hands of an experienced PbP GM you can have some sublime experiences. (Chiefly the GM has to have some good skills at discipline for posting speeds.)
    • You’ll find people more willing to experiment with other game systems since there’s no rush to figure out the rules when it’s your action.

    Minus (bad things):

    • A lot of people who are absolutely terrible GMs seem so resort to PbP as a last resort. Playing under these is like pulling teeth.
    • These same terrible GMs are really, really fragile and will smack-talk you or try to engage you in long debates about how great their GMing style is and how it’s your problem, not theirs that you didn’t enjoy the game, etc.
    • The pace in even a well-run game is positively glacial. Not all styles of play can fit here, so if you’re interested in dungeon crawls … uh … might want to look elsewhere.
    • (RPOL-specific) The UX when I played it was nasty. It took forever to internalize the weird way they structured and displayed their site. It has a lot of features, but it’s very hard to find them or use them. (The die roller is a case in point: very powerful, but so odd to use that I tried my hardest to avoid having to roll dice whenever possible.)

    Interesting (good or bad depending on perspective):

    • It may be the only option open for some people to RP without going solo.
    • The different pacing lends itself to entirely different styles of game, allowing you to explore different styles of play.



  • Blade predates Vampire: The Masquerade by almost 20 years. V:TM was 1991. Blade was introduced in 1973. The iconic look of Blade was firmly established by the time V:TM was published; it’s far more likely that V:TM was at least partially influenced by Blade than vice versa.

    The hierarchy of vampires also predates V:TM. Underworld came after, but the foundations of vampiric society were laid at the very least in Anne Rice’s œvre (the “Vampire Chronicles”) beginning, again, in the '70s. 1976 to be precise. And while Rein-Hagen claims (and I believe him) that he deliberately didn’t read Anne Rice until late in the development of V:TM, he also acknowledges that the vampire movies whose look he was borrowing from were likely very strongly influenced by Rice.

    As was Underworld.

    I think the “Grumpy Wizard” is grossly overstating the influence of RPGs on popular culture.