![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/d3d059e3-fa3d-45af-ac93-ac894beba378.png)
Not sure if they get much hate but they sure get a lot of shit
Not sure if they get much hate but they sure get a lot of shit
So imagine a society dominated by men.
This society knows that sex is what leads to children. What it doesn’t know is how to verify if a child belongs to a particular man.
As this society is patriarchal in nature, it’s very important to the leaders/men that their lineage is protected. So they need a way to ensure that children’s bloodline can be properly guaranteed. The only way to control that is to make sure that women are bound to a specific man, and that sex with any other man is forbidden/disgusting. This is why bastard children and unwed mothers have historically been treated with such disdain. But men were often given a pass. The women were screwing up lineage tracking.
Tracking is less an issue these days, but the social conditioning is still there. We’ve forgotten why we prioritized it in the first place (right or wrong). Now it’s the way many people think because it’s been the way we’ve behaved for so long, much of society is geared around it being a basic truth.
I have a similar thing, but I got over it by committing to robbing every vendor of everything they have. Then there’s no one to buy the stupid fork.
Cancer research? Subsidized childcare in poor neighborhoods? Alma mater scholarship funding?
There’s a lot of apolitical fundraising.
It blows my mind that so many questions in this community could be instantly answered by Google. Just typing “whinging” gives its definition and identifies it as British.
The question wasn’t stupid. But OP was too lazy to even try and do their own research. Which ironically resulted in more work for them.
This isn’t wrong, but it’s misleading. A huge portion of that statement is based on newborns dying. There were also early advances in medicine that helped by the time around the birth of America. (Which is where this judge serves/gained a lifetime appointment.)
In 1850 (in Wales, which is a good representation of a Western civilization), 20 year olds could expect to live into their 60s. And 50 year olds into their 70s. https://ourworldindata.org/life-expectancy
While the 90+ crowd is an exception, that’s true even in our time. But living into your 70s was not unusual when the laws were written.
It’s not necessarily lazy. If I want to go back to a particular post I saw on page 1 when I’m on page 2, but it was knocked off the front page, how would I find it? It’s no longer on page 1, so back would miss it. I’d have to go to 1 and then back again to 2 to find a post that moved.
It gets even more complicated when the algorithm also changes post order.
Sometimes simple with minor inconvenience is the best option.
Yeah, but to be fair, that defeats the point OP is making by stating their sex frequency. If it’s all relative, then his activity is irrelevant when discussing someone else’s.
“Those aren’t two pillows!”
“Nobody leaves this place without singin’ the blues.”
“It’s showtime!”
“That’s not a motorcycle, baby. It’s a chopper.”
"You’re a daisy if you do.’
“Mr. Blutarsky. Zero-point-zero.”"
“I want my two dollars!”
“So THAT’S how it is in their family.”
Hi! Googling this question reveals the answer is yes, it does result in fusion.
As far as the output, according to this top result paper, that depends heavily on the size of the black hole, the size and speed of the accretion disk, and the medium from which the black hole is drawing (like a white dwarf vs interstellar gas).
From what I can make out–and I have no background–the author maps out results as high in weight as nickel.
Edit: grammar
I think it’s, “but my god is the journal itself atrocious”
OP is saying they’ve heard people claim it but hasn’t seen evidence. They’re wondering if anybody has some, because otherwise they’re treating it as a rumor.
I don’t know. Ford was a lot of shitty things. But he was also an actual innovator, not just an investor who thought he was an innovator.
And as egocentric as he was, he still saw the value in providing free healthcare, food, reasonable hours, and good wages to workers.
He was a collosal asshole but I don’t think it’s fair to compare him to Musk.
Maybe? But I know what I’m getting with Sync. Donations to FOSS don’t guarantee anything.
And really, once we start talking about donating to free software with the expectation of specific returns, we’re basically talking about paying for software. If a specific set of FOSS is only good when people pay for it, there’s a problem with the incentivization to work on that set of software.
Nobody is recommending OP solely drink soda for hydration. The point was just that caffeine is not a real issue for hydration.
If we’re going to give safety warnings for caffeinated drinks–as though OP were unaware that caffeine over consumption is not magically avoided if you’re trying to hydrate–let’s also advise them to take reasonably sized sips so they don’t choke and to drink from clean containers so they don’t get sick.
If you’re reading this OP, virtually everything you drink is hydrating. Milk. Coffee. Soda. Juice. Tea. If you’re chugging oil-based liquids, those aren’t hydrating. But I’m guessing they aren’t a major part of your diet.
They are definitely bad for your teeth. My dentist/wife does not like how much I drink them, but since she works on me for free I don’t see a downside
I haven’t studied this either, but I think it’ll give you superpowers when the carbonic acid mixes with sunlight to create blue kryptonite.
Check out pandemic. It’s a game where everyone wins or everyone loses.
Ah yes. The game of everlasting friendship.
You blocked my road! I needed to build on that spot! I’m trapped! You’re picking me again for the baron? You do realize if you trade with them they’re going to win, right?
Stop trying to make fetch happen.