I’m unsure of what a finite planet is referencing? Is op suggesting that economic limits are constrained to finite resources? This doesn’t take into account renewables, human creativity and a whole list of other things. If we create a matrix like environment where the limits can be expanded and create new products in that new environment we can still use fiat.
Thanks for the info, i didn’t know that and understand it a bit better now.
I think if it’s going on every windows computer windows should have a process in place to prevent what happened from happening. Windows are for profit, they have the money to do it right but they got greedy. A staggered rollout would have prevented most of it and is a very simple thing to require. Also if it’s going on every windows computer or most I wouldn’t consider that a third party anymore even if that’s how they keep liabilities at arms length
Doesn’t Microsoft allow crowdstrike to make updates? Being such a critical part of the OS it’s up to Microsoft to ensure their procedures are robust and being followed.
So why is this considered a crowdstrike issue and not a Microsoft fuckup?
No you.
While he didn’t say it explicitly, he heavily implied it. There’s a lot of nuance in his teachings that can be missed by a novice such as yourself.
Mildly to firmly squeeze your penis while moving your hand back and forward
This is the exact same story the whole internet has used and every time the 3rd party or whoever it is eventually gets corrupted and it turns out that they kept the original data. The company gets bought by Amazon or who google and repeat
RIP Firefox the decline is in full swing. Great time for a company who actually cares about privacy to devour it. I’m looking at you proton.
I’ll stop buying anything when megayatchs are banned
At least they’re trying
I feel like a lot of this is exported from America. There certainly seems to be some lag between the nonsense we see in the us and the rest of the world
Cool so we can just make up our own rules now. Well, all Microsoft products are freeware now because the same reason this guy
To be honest this scenario takes me less energy than the idea that one side is indiscriminately killing and torturing 100% innocent people purely based on their tribe. I still believe 95% of the stories are biased or missing important context but I can accept that there are going to be outliers that are plain evil even within context. For example the actions on oct 8 were plain evil even within context. If you can justify those actions as reasonable you can justify these actions as reasonable.
You’re a sick son of a removed
This is because they haven’t the capital or preparation to do so.
I would argue this isn’t the whole picture which is a significant flaw in the argument. There’s a lot of people who if they had the capital or the preparation would destroy the value they were given.
Bread lick-gar.
Bread licka