On that page, you can choose “version history” to get their list of changes, unfortunately for this one all they put was “bug fixes”…
Good news though, this is an open source project, so easy enough to just go to the source…
Github issue: https://github.com/bitwarden/clients/issues/8873
And here’s all of the commits that have gone into it since 2024.5.1: https://github.com/bitwarden/clients/compare/web-v2024.5.1…desktop-v2024.6.2
Worst thing? Someone with access to your password can now break into the associated account, and use that access to snoop or potentially permanently lock you out. E2EE data could be lost forever if they change the password and 2FA.
More likely? Unless you reuse passwords, or the associated site has been recently compromised, pretty low odds of compromise. If you suspect your 2FA has leaked, just get a new secret, easy peasy. Most reputable sites should alert you to a login on a new device, potentially giving you time to react or alerting you of snooping.
If your secret leaks without context on what site it’s associated with, then unless your name is Taylor Swift, odds of someone associating it to a site, let alone the matching password, are astronomical.
Lemmy and snarky references back to Reddit like that ex-girlfriend you’ve “totally moved on from”
You running the Trump campaign in your spare time?
… that they’ve disclosed so far…
I love that the cover image for this article about buying Chinese EVs is a car from a Swedish manufacturer (Polestar, owned by Volvo). Western media really knows jack shit about the Chinese EV market.
Is the “he” here not Netanyahu? If so, you can be certain he does not care about separation of church and state.
Pretty straightforward.
Also, claiming excessive losses is probably an attempt at tax evasion.
Kagi:
Quick Answer
Based on the available information, the “slipping on a banana peel” gag has been a staple of comedy films since the early 20th century. The first known appearance of this gag on the big screen was in the Charlie Chaplin movie “By the Sea”, where Chaplin’s character “The Tramp” tosses a banana peel on the ground and then slips on it later. [1][2]
The banana peel gag was soon adopted by other silent film stars like Buster Keaton, who featured it in his 1928 film “The Cameraman”. [3] The gag continued to be used in comedy films throughout the 20th century, including in the 1926 Harold Lloyd film “For Heaven’s Sake”. [4]
However, the available information does not mention any specific 1980s comedy movies that featured the banana peel gag. The gag seems to have been more prevalent in the silent film era and earlier decades of the 20th century. [1][5]
To add, second result in Brave:
https://www.imdb.com/search/keyword/?keywords=slipping-on-a-banana-peel
Per Brave:
slip banana peel 1980s comedy movie
The classic comedy gag of slipping on a banana peel has been a staple in entertainment for decades. In the 1980s, this gag was featured in several comedy movies. One notable example is the 1983 film “Trading Places” starring Eddie Murphy and Dan Aykroyd. In the movie, a character played by Jamie Lee Curtis slips on a banana peel, leading to a series of comedic events.
Another example is the 1985 film “The Sure Thing” starring John Cusack and Daphne Zuniga. In this movie, a character played by John Cusack slips on a banana peel while trying to impress a girl, leading to a series of awkward and humorous moments.
The banana peel gag has also been featured in several other 1980s comedy movies, including “The Blues Brothers” (1980) and “Caddyshack” (1980). These films showcase the enduring popularity of this comedic trope and its ability to bring laughter and entertainment to audiences.
AI-generated answer. Please verify critical facts. Learn more
I personally find it much better than DDG, and only a slight improvement over Brave. DDG’s reliance on Bing leaves me !banging my way out almost half the time.
I mean look you could just not use Visa right? We all have tons of other options, and they’re totally not a monopoly right? That’s why we’re not regulating them, right?
If you can’t enter a kill code and have your phone self destruct into a million pieces, can your life even be considered private?
Yeah, except everyone has had it beaten into them - nobody fucks with gas prices.
Every news outlet in the country runs the same news segment practically daily - “Let’s complain about gas prices”. We’ve somehow made it the subject of basically nonstop discussion.
Funds raised will be used to offset further increases in subsidies to the domestic oil industry
That’s what I figured, but I saw “high speed USB 2.0” a bunch of times and got confused.
I’ll be sticking with my smart outlets for the foreseeable future, can plug multiple USB hubs into a single one. Feels like it would only be an added benefit in a few minor things or if you’re really really space constrained.
I’m struggling to figure out the use case for this device - is it just a glorified outlet switch or can it communicate with the USB device?
It boasts “high speed” USB 2.0 data, but what devices is it actually capable with talking to? And what does it do with that info? Is there a list somewhere of compatible devices?
I assume data transmission rates over ZigBee are a joke (as they should be, it’s for low powered networking). What benefits are there to having this thing as a middle man for your data?
Not trying to hate on it, just really struggling to come up with a use case in my mind.
capture the generated codes and time of input in some way, then brute force hashes until they generate one that produces the correct codes at x time
Given a TOTP key is usually at least 18 characters for a 6-digit code, having only one data point sticks you with something on the order of 10^28 possible keys for a given singular code (way more if case sensitive). You’d need to be regularly intercepting TOTP codes to brute force your way to the right key, and even then it’d only be valid for a single site. At that point it probably means you’ve fully compromised the connecting device or server, at which point, why do you even need the TOTP again?
Are you perhaps an LLM in disguise?