The child in that case is not the user (or at least not the owner). The user is the parent who configures the phone as they choose and loans it to the child. It’s no different than Apple allowing a business to configure a MacBook as they choose, including tools to monitor its usage, and then offering that computer to one of their employees. The owner of the device gets to choose the privacy settings, not necessarily the end user.

Also in today’s announcement, Apple introduced a new section called “Podcasts by Language,” allowing users in the U.S., U.K., Canada and Australia to more easily find podcasts based on language, including English, Spanish, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Chinese and Korean.

It seems silly that they have so few languages available in the Podcasts by Language section.

Even if they just processed the associated text of their podcasts with NLLanguageRecognizer to get a likely classification that users could search for for likely hits it seems like it would be better than what they have now.

A work-around-ish is to quickly scroll to the bottom and hit next to jump to the second page and start browsing from there. Everytime you hit “next” after that, you’ll see some repetition from where the new posts loaded and pushed content down, but it’s not a live update like on the first page.

But yeah, they really need to push the update out that fixes this problem.

I scanned through the comments here and I don’t think it’s been mentioned yet, but I would love, love, love to have an option added to settings to open links in a new tab (or possibly windows if some people would prefer that). The current behavior is to open in the current tab, which I am so unaccustomed to I keep closing the tab when I’m done with it rather than hitting the back arrow.

It’s quite jarring to not open in a new tab these days, especially for external links.

I honestly couldn’t care less. Open source is not and never has been a differentiator for me when it comes to software, much less a requirement.

not only is it like reddit, its better

Enh…

So did the editors at Awful Announcing write that incredibly nuance-free headline intentionally? Because if not, they should probably reread their own article and do a bit of self-reflection.