After lead and Asbestos they had to find something to keep the troll going.
Natanox
Lemmy account of natanox@chaos.social
- 17 Posts
- 93 Comments
Finally a worthy opponent for Mexican Chili.
Aaah, got it. So if I see something like “5-(2+4)” I will just remove the subtraction operator and call it a day. Smartman on the internet said so. 🥴
Also casual reminder not everyone on the internet is a native english speaker. Everyone but you knew what was meant.
Natanox@discuss.tchncs.deto
Science Memes@mander.xyz•Let's stick with just the one observer from now on, thenEnglish
151·11 days agoWell yes, however intuitively there should be photons smashing into it even if nobody is observing it.
Natanox@discuss.tchncs.deto
Science Memes@mander.xyz•Statistically, probably with the beetles. 🪲English
7·16 days agoLÖMP!
Why should anyone do that, an implied multiplication is the normal thing you learn in (I think?) somewhere between 5th to 7th grade. You only add an operator if it’s something else. It’s as basic as PEMDAS.
Every time someone talks about you being supposedly free to choose where to work they should get instant diarrhea. Let alone medicine of course, that’s a hard dependence.
Nobody is truly free without proper UBI and free healthcare and good public transport. Only then true freedom can exist.
Natanox@discuss.tchncs.deto
Science Memes@mander.xyz•Oh please tell me this is true!English
8·1 month agoAnd the dad doesn’t care. Pfeh, typical. /lh
No, the light would be reflected as soon as the mirror is set up. If the mirror is set up 10 lightyears away it would take 10 years for you to see it and whatever it reflects. There already is light on the way to the position of the mirror before you set it up.
But only after 10 years. You couldn’t see anything that wasn’t visible from the viewpoint of the mirror beforehand, as from earth’s point of view the mirror isn’t there yet. And if you’re there anyway… you can just look at Earth with the craft that’s on the position of the mirror already.
The big fucking constellation of mirrors from Reflect Orbital sweeped over our equipment and destroyed everything. Also his eyes are now toasted.
I can only imagine what those huge beaks were for. Like diving from the sky at some prey, simply punching it straight through it like a huge spear.
Natanox@discuss.tchncs.deto
Science Memes@mander.xyz•Mary E. Brunkow, one of this year's Nobel Prize winners in Medicine, has only 34 published papers and an H-index of 21.English
15·2 months agoDon’t worry, that system is currently being completely fucked by AI as well.
Natanox@discuss.tchncs.deto
Science Memes@mander.xyz•Asking for a chocaholic friendEnglish
22·3 months agoI had a good day, we all had good days, until you mentioned that unbearable hypocrite.
I’d prefer any other format on the sole basis of “not maintained by <insert Corposcum>”.
As a non-native english speaker I’ve no clue what you’re trying to say brcause both sound the same, so here’s a picture of cheese.

I wonder how that dino actually looked like.
Probably like a huge chicken.
I heavily disagree. As a visual learner I need pictures. Everything is visual to me, even math, language, programming… if you give me a wall of text using abstract terms I won’t understand shit. I require graphs, visual representations, mindmaps, something.
It might not be the optimal medium for everyone (there is no universally accessible medium for anything!), but to argue that pictures make things less accessible is just plain wrong.
Natanox@discuss.tchncs.deto
Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml•i love ai in my offline foss softwares that are still in betaEnglish
221·3 months agoYou don’t bet in achieving a pipe dream in the near future when developing something (at least I hope you don’t). The actual AI devs are also rather humble about what can be realistically achieved in the near future if they’re allowed to speak openly, it’s the techbros and investors who’re blowing everything up so phenomenally that the only way for this bubble - which by now is big enough to crash the US economy on its own - to proceed is to achieve the literally impossible, which is General Artificial Intelligence within at least the next 2 to 3 years (they can only pump so much money into it). I haven’t heard a single developer or scientist saying this to even be remotely realistic.
This is more about economics than programming, AI experts and grifters just collect the money as long as the bubble persist. Also has to do with tech-solutionism and latestage capitalism. In the end the science of Machine Learning will prevail (although a lot of devs might need to find other specialisations; perhaps COBOL?), but this economical house of cards will fall apart. Let’s hope it will burry US-neolibertarianism and -fascism under it this time.





If this is a real headline then the author is either incompetent regarding code and the complexity of big projects or very competent in regards to marketing and making ragebait headlines. Either of the two.