NOOOOOOOO
Please no, don’t subsidize anything Java-Script. It will only make it less efficient.
Interesting.
So it basically enables some more compiler magic. As an embedded guy I’ll stay away from it, since I like my code being translated a bit more directly, but maybe I’ll look into the generated code and see if I can apply some of the ideas for optimizations in the future.
I never looked into this, so I have some questions.
Isn’t the overhead of a new function every time going to slow it down? Like I know that LLVM has special instructions for Haskell-functions to reduce overhead, but there is still more overhead than with a branch, right? And if you don’t use Haskell, the overhead is pretty extensive, pushing all registers on the stack, calling new function, push buffer-overflow protection and eventual return and pop everything again. Plus all the other stuff (kinda language dependent).
I don’t understand what advantage is here, except for stuff where recursive makes sense due to being more dynamic.
Ya, they hired the lawyer, what else is he gonna say.
Actual snowflake behavior. It looks bad and they play it up.
It seems to be a normal check they have to do after the money-laundering-law from 2021.
Germany has big issues with money laundering and since 2021 they’ve been cracking down. The FIU has almost tripled the investigations since then.
I like how the article doesn’t mention that at all and just goes for the conspiracies on fucking state level.
Edit: I got baited by fucking hexbear, my bad.
They are already mad. Have you met mathematicians?
Can we stop pretending Rust doesn’t take performance trade-offs? Of course if you compare it one to one its roughly the same, since it’s compiled. But Optimizing memory for cache hits becomes a lot more difficult in Rust, to the point where you have to use unsafe. And unsafe Rust has more undefined behavior than C. In my opinion C is more safe than unsafe Rust.
If you want normal performance its a good Language, but once you need to Optimize memory, which is usually the bottleneck, You are out of luck.
Well, right about online stuff. I would also have ridiculous standards if there were 10x more women than men. Just expand your social circle and eventually you’ll meet normal people XD
I think this basically just tests how heavy chromosomes/DNA-strands are. By that you can see how long they are. The many lines on the side are the reference-ladder.
The clear lines in the second pic indicate a very clean sample of similar length DNA, while the smears in the first indicate some form of contamination.
More here