- 27 Posts
- 360 Comments
Why not? no less insane then the rest of the stuff Graham Hancock and the like put forward.
Not yet. But let it be known that it was built by a extraterrestrial Inuit tribe in trade for the finest Italian blubber.
2·2 months agoIn the reference picture of this clock the degree symbol does that. This is something you can see outside of the US on almost all temp readings, my phone for example does not have F or C next to it. (It is still in Celsius since I am not a monster)
Hate to point this out, but the fact there is a “C” on the sign kinda shows that no America did not adopt the metric system. If the US did there would be no reason to have “F” or “C” by the degrees as they are the last hold out.
Not out yet. But you can manually set your clocks and disable boost.
It was nice to see the line go down
3·5 months agoThe question is why? Having big corporations beyond the control of regulation should not be as normalized as it is.
Yeah that $1000 fine should fix things (or whatever amount they pick)
13·5 months agoThis makes no sense. That is not a sensible reply to that comment.
1·5 months agoIt’s what plants crave!
No I claimed that putin (russia) has threatened the west with strategic weapons (well implied it anyway, I never made any direct claims). Now you think that somehow multiple nations saying putin has threaten them does not count (for some reason), Putin putting on a big show and dance about strategic weapon drills means nothing, that during many speeches putin eluding to using those weapons means nothing, oh and even after you yourself said “Russia already stated that they will do precisely that, so this moves us one step closer to a nuclear holocaust. Hope it was worth it.” somehow that is not a threat?
Oh there is no point of continuing the discussion but I know you will respond anyway.
Oh? news to me. I was just showing that the world outside russia agrees putin has on a few occasions threatened the use of strategic weapons (because he did).
See the best part of the thing you are replying to is that you can not seem to tell me apart from other people. My “pithy one-liner” was a dig on how another .Ml person just so happens to show up to have the argument as the russian apologist. No where did I claim to provide any primary sources, in fact if you look you can see me making fun of that requirement.
But hey, at least you are a fan of Ben Shapiro. That must be neat.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/5/9/russias-putin-says-arrogant-west-risking-global-conflict
"We will not allow anyone to threaten us. Our strategic forces are always in a state of combat readiness.”
I know you will never be satisfied, so I will just keep doing this until you provide proof that russia is stronger now then before Feb 2022.
Funny you bring up primary sources…
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-64397745
https://www.politico.eu/article/putin-threaten-arm-west-enemy-with-long-range-missile/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RyanPIR-898
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/3/1/how-real-is-putins-threat-to-nuke-the-west
https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2022-10/news/putin-calls-reservists-renews-nuclear-threat
https://nypost.com/2022/12/10/putin-threatens-preemptive-nuclear-strike-as-war-drags-on/
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/putin-ukraine-nato-nuclear-weapons-1.6362890
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2024/02/29/putin-russia-state-union-speech-military/
Oh yeah, that is how that must work for you every statement you make is true and anyone else needs to provide proof otherwise, and it does not count if you don’t agree.
Oh its so much funnier then that, They then provide non primary sources while demanding everyone else “Proves” them wrong only with primary sources. This is a joke at this point.
Should be, go nuts look it up.
Next time try Fishermans friends and straight hot sauce.