Which might be a reference to a roman grave poem with the words “you are what I once was, you will become what I am now”
No tree is a tree. “Tree” is not a clearly-defined taxonomical category. Anything that is tree-like gets grouped under the catgory “tree”.
Those versions have different axioms from which different things can be proven, but we don’t define 9.9 repeating as 1
YEAH WASP DISCOURSE AGAIN WOOHOO
I think it’s related to the tumblr post about killing a geologist
Is this a sovcit thing?
Except that venus is just absolutely hostile to everything
Oedipus dit also cut his eyes out when he realised what he had done, so…
Fucking love Deleuze. Don’t understand a word he has written, but love him anyway.
Blue, absolutely
Dyke is also a slur for lesbian
No but you see I, a stranger on the internet, agree with the message of the post. Therefore, it must be correct, as one is unable to lie on the internet lest their shins be removed by the cyberpolice.
You seem to agree with the post, so why does your comment read like you are trying to show you are superior to it?
Like XMPP?
The poor get poorer and the rich get richer because of the economical system we live under, not because of the banking industry. Crypto isn’t going to solve that.
I agree that banks are not to be trusted, but a blockchain hasn’t proven to be a safe option either.
You also just skipped over my comment. I take that means that you acknowledge that crypto is extremely wasteful and would never scale unless gigantic changes were made to how it functions?
Please do remember that the banking industry provides banking for the entire world, instead of ~ten thousand people. It does cost a lot of energy, yes, but the energy per person is far less than with any cryptocurrency.
They could, and we couldn’t stop them, but I think they legally couldn’t use content from other instances or even from users from other instances. Not that that will stop them, of course.
I hope to one day be brave enough to switch to 9front