They’ll hear “freedom of speech” as they are free to hate David Tennant, LGBT and black people all at the same time. No need to pick.

Well he is the one on Kemi Badenoch’s side.

Are we still talking about “skunk”? I’m pretty sure most of the stuff you find in “regulated” environments like Amsterdam is stronger than anything you’d find in the UK.

I’m open to trying fingers, but you’re the butt hole

I hadn’t really heard about his positions on Russia and was an interesting read. Now I will think twice before voting him as an independent if I ever happen to move to Islington.

Not really relevant here though is he?

Sounds like a waste of milkshake. We should be dunking him in something much less edible.

It’s a meme about science.

That seems… fantastical. I can’t imagine labour taking every single seat in the East Midlands at least.

It’s a pretty trashy tabloidy site for sure. Not sure I agree with not reporting on politicians ignoring issues, or flip flopping on previous pledges. The press shouldn’t really succumb to apathy at any point.

What a terrible headline. It’s an interesting article, but I’m surprised i clicked on it to be honest, with what little information is conveyed in the headline and summary.

‘good thing to aim for’

Of course it is the end goal of the ultra wealthy to reduce their own tax burden and say it is good for the country.

It seems like all of the data is in the article to me. There are searchable tables on all of the criteria and the information comes from the publicly accessible TV show that is being studied. I’m sure if you trawled through every episode and charted the guests yourself, it would be easy to point out anything false.

It looks like the study is still ongoing and has not been “published” in that it has not been written up and peer reviewed, but this is an article about the raw data collected and drawing some conclusions from that alone.

Even if it were peer reviewed and published in a journal, the peers would not go through and verify the data before publication.

Why do political parties even receive donations? It doesn’t make sense to me that this is even a thing. It’s just open corruption.

That’s an interesting take on “Young people won’t be exploited as much”.

He added: “Something is happening out there. There is a rejection of the political class going on in this country in a way that has not been seen in modern times.”

I see, so what we need is a slimy career politician running the party which is full of privileged career politicians. That’ll really shake things up!

Don’t threaten us with a good time.

The increase primarily comes from Reform UK ending its promise not to stand against Conservatives

I didnt realise this was how promises worked.

I would love to be represented by someone not from the area who, when asked a direct question, simply answers another question entirely that no-one asked about. Really says they have my interests as a constituent at the forefront.

You could put them all in hotels for less than that, with the secondary effect of stimulating local businesses. Isn’t that what conservatives are all about? Or is it only when they own said businesses?

Not really gaslight, just good old reversal of a campaign promise, as is tradition.