The “meth of the masses” analogy would mean that it still has the unhealthy, deceptive and deafening aspects of a drug addiction, but without the “soothing last refuge of peace” part
Then the analogy is spot on.
The “meth of the masses” analogy would mean that it still has the unhealthy, deceptive and deafening aspects of a drug addiction, but without the “soothing last refuge of peace” part
Then the analogy is spot on.
I don’t see how that’s an adequate example.
It seems like you’re making a bad attempt at a caricature instead of actually explaining.
I don’t see what makes these things incapable of being present at the same time as democracy.
Seems like these statements are based on feelings, not actual reasoning.
I remember when they had the same idea around 2014, to ban smoking for anyone born in the UK from 2000 onwards. That would have been easier to enforce.
You mean that games need to have 100 000 copies sold to get to the 30% cut?