This is indeed a bug and can reproduce on Arch 6.1.0. Please check if is has been reported at https://bugs.kde.org, and, if it hasn’t, please report it.
Edite: Submitted - https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=489025
This is indeed a bug and can reproduce on Arch 6.1.0. Please check if is has been reported at https://bugs.kde.org, and, if it hasn’t, please report it.
Edite: Submitted - https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=489025
Someone creates a username/password in System Settings and then activates the server on the remote computer. Then they need to approve you the first time you try to log in from your personal computer… I’m not sure this answers your question.
All the pieces fit together, you know, and show a yet unpublished screenshot with Plasma’s new looks.
It is. Includes a a bug-inducing NVIDIA GPU, unfortunately. For the rest of it, it is quite good with Plasma 6.
Has this been reported? If not, please report it:
If it has, maybe bump it with your video? It is clear indicator as to what is wrong.
Thanks you for your cooperation!
The risk is low. Your email address is not visible by the general public. A spammer would have to go through a manual registration process to see it. Sounds like a lot of work for a small niche number of email addresses.
Either way, when in doubt, do as suggested: use your spam-catching email address.
Great! My advice is you politely comment on it with your own experience or your insight into what the correct behaviour should be. This will not only give devs a measure of the importance of this bug, but will also keep you in the loop of the process of its resolution.
If you think you have found a bug, please report it at https://bugs.kde.org. This is will help get it solved as opposed to every other course of action.
a) Not an ad
b) LabPlot is KDE’s data visualization and analysis app.
there’s not really a substitute for After Effects yet,
Have you tried Natron? This software still needs some serious love, but maybe you can appreciate its potential as tool for people used to AE.
I agree. That said, users coming from proprietary tools may be gracious enough to meet the volunteers building free software at least half way.
There are abrasive people everywhere and everyone has an opinion. In a community without a top-down hierarchical structure, every Tom, Dick and Henrietta thinks they know what’s best for the project and will tell you so. Don’t take it personally, remember everybody wants what is best, and, if you believe in your proposal, persevere. There is someone who agrees with you.
This is PR bullshit. They have not changed their license one iota from what it was 2 days ago and, ultimately, the license is what goes. They have not corrected course. All they have done is asked users to trust them in a blog post. The problem with that is that blog posts are not legally binding and, in a field full of nasty, predatory and untrustworthy firms, Adobe is one of the nastiest, most predatory and least trustworthy . You do with that what you will.
Even if you lack knowledge regarding development, advice from professional designers and artists is always appreciated. I think it would be helpful if you picked a project with receptive developers and offered them your insight.
Don’t take this the wrong way. While I appreciate the tact with which you have expressed your criticisms, but you may find that your objections all boil down to “I am used to a certain set of tools and now I have to change. The new tools do things differently and I am confused and it is messing with my productivity”, that is, the problem is not entirely with the new software, but with you, your workflow and your muscle memory.
It is not perfect, of course! It also does not have the resources of Blender. Then again, both pieces of software are quite different and have different uses.
Are you implying that Adobe products are not “300% better”??!??! Outrageous.
Very hard to say for me. I did use AutoCAD, but it was years ago. I’m talking more than two decades (AutoCAD was first released in the early 80s), so impossible to judge the current state of the software now.
I can say FreeCAD is good for 3D printing stuff. I also like OpenSCAD, a 3D scripting language.
I wrote a 4 part tutorial series that takes you from designing to printing and covered both FreeCAD and OpenSCAD from a beginner’s perspective, if you are interested:
🙄