Care to elaborate how?

Don’t worry, their dating app will solve the population issues

You’re focusing on the above gum situation and not the underneath. Having a tooth that could grow and fill a void where an implant would not be successful is huge.

Trump would treat them better?

Settling for less God awful sums up what brought America to this point perfectly

Hilary lost cause she was a God awful candidate the establishment tried to force feed us. Had they gone with someone more viable, with less baggage, they would have won, irrespective of Russian interference

deleted by creator

And if you don’t want to be retaliated against, don’t attack ships.

Curious how you logic justifies their attacks on western ships, but not the west’s response to these attacks.

Climate change destroyed Florida’s reefs. China destroyed the Phillipines

So long as you allow it to happen

Is California planning on standardizing the speed limit across the state? Or will they need to know where you’re at to enforce the limiter…

Track me harder daddy government

Who are you?

Just curious, do you want everyone living in cookie cutter multifamily boxes or are people allowed to have houses and different size pieces of land and buildings in your utopia?

North Korea would be leveled wall to wall with air strikes if this ever happened. And kim knows this.

Go a reread the last sentence in my statement and explain how that implies trump has to win. Ive clearly stated the problem is with trump running, we can’t afford to lose to teach the dem establishment a lesson.

If you actually fully read my comment, you would realize there was no point for yours.

Ron Paul was viable but ran as a republican and got the establishment treatment despite insane support from the younger generations. His party prevented him from being a 2nd name on the ballot for Republicans. Then many years later, the exact same thing happened to Bernie who was fucked over from a 2nd spot on the ballot by a last second rule change vote at the democratic convention when the nays clearly outweighed the yays. Both times those respective parties lost those elections. Both times they would have won should they have gone with the people that would have brought about change to our political systems. The establishment doesn’t care about losing. Only preserving itself.

It does not achieve absolutely nothing. It sends a message of policy requirements to obtain a percentage of votes. Meaning, if dems lose enough elections by a margin that is seen voting elsewhere they will have to move their policy to secure those votes and start winning again. The problem now is with trump threatening our freedoms and democracy, we can’t afford to teach those stubborn centrists a lesson in true progressive policy.