What’s your opinion on the woman king?
Enlighten me, which person “made” the film that is a “litteral child trafficker”? If you are talking about the person listed in this gobbledyremoved title, go look into the case a little further before knee-jerk reacting and looking foolish like these other goobers.
Oh wow look at that, using rollingstone as a source and running with blinders on. Hey look at how many people liked your comment, you must be right.
Thats a complete failure to interpret or mischaracterization of my entire point about the smear campaign against the movie. In your fire analogy a better characterization would be:
A building is on fire. Standing outside of it is a person yelling loudly “This building is on fire!”. Nobody is asking him what started the fire or why he is worried about the fire since buildings catch on fire multiple times a year. But he just keeps standing there yelling at anyone that will listen. Then he is approached by members of the crowd that has gathered who all berate him for being so loud and abnoxious and explain to him that house fires happen all the time and to let the authorities handle it, that it’s not really an issue to be concerned with. Then another member of the crowd says, “Hey! I know someone that donated to this building fund when it was being built, and he was accessory to arson! So shut up about this building being on fire, it was only built by people that approve of arson!”
You don’t believe this is odd behavior?
“These people” sounds a little bias eh? I’m so confused at the smear campaign for a movie that vilifies child trafficking.
Why is it obvious? You don’t think J6 was traumatic?
While I don’t think your premise is correct, I appreciate the lengthy write up and the stories, it is possible the OP felt it was just an endearing story. I consume a lot of politcal media/news and not many people that are active politically (and not just vomiting left/right wing talking points from cnn/fox) think positively of this administration to the point it has become really doubtful for me that anyone can truly share positive info on Biden’s family or the Biden admin unless it is to promote a politically motivated agenda. I think most people that still promote his admin fall into a few catagories: either they are very poorly informed/misinformed through watching bias media (cnn/msnbc, not to say right right wing media isn’t bias just doesn’t apply here) with little to zero personal investigation or research, not politically involved/echo chamber because orange man bad and all conservatives are racist/bigots and want to strip women’s rights, or attention seekers, the kind that only wish to be a victim or virtue signal. Sadly because people are so determined to form sides and be either team red or team blue, most people (especially young college age/indoctrinated youth) are very binary.
Nah I’ll stick around :)
Lemmy is so reddit 2.0 lol, fucking astroturfing for Biden.
That’s a very difficult question tbh my initial thoughts are less than 1 month. Abortion should not be used as birth control and obviously abortions that are necessary for either mothers safety or under dire circumstances like rape/underage etc… or severe instances of fetal health should all be legal much later as anatomy scans for babies health are needed to identify many serious deformities.
Abortion is legal and killing babies is celebrated.
Being in favor of infants right to life and women’s choice to make decisions about their body until they make the choose to share their body with another human is criminalized.*
Ftfy. Imagine being in favor of killing babies and thinking the side that wanted to kill infants because “women’s rights to kill babies even after birth in California” somehow trumps babies right to life isn’t an atrocity comparable to slavery.
Is his clan just “Rargh” ? I enjoy all the then we fight videos, clan chats are generally just too toxic and annoying for me to stay and hang out in but I might give rargh a try
Very true, limited OS support kills most devices eventually, sadly there is only so much you can mandate as many apps and programs will stop working on old OS as they are updated. What should be criminal is apple patching old OS too purposely slow them down.
Doubtful since those are not required for the life/longevity of the tech.
How does this comment have nearly 50 up votes?
deleted by creator
Exactly and too each, their own. I mean a lot of the time when I see absolutely crazy grinds (like 200m one skill at a time) I definitely question someone’s lifestyle and mental health but it’s an internal thought that I don’t feel the need or desire to discuss with random people who play the same time sink and I don’t want to risk needlessly offending someone or bringing someone down. Again it may be an age thing but I have become much more of a lurker than a poster and commenter because it’s all extremes and no middle ground for discussion or general decency.
Lol