WIth or without tax?

They’ve decided who their customers are, and it’s not you

Since FF is free - isn’t that a given?

For Windows 11, it would be an ad for Hitler instead of just a picture.

Only one century has passed since then, so we’re still good. It’s pollutin’ time!

In other words - like 99% of the laws: good publicity intentions meets reality.

Should Greece really be on that list? The only criterion where it’s not grayed out is “Awarded Parts of China to Japan”, which actually means “signed the Treaty of Versailles after WWI”. And unlike many of the other countries that signed it, Greece did not get anything to itself from it.

So if you don’t sell it, and instead rent it out to other people, he’d get a portion of the rent the future tenant pays? And I don’t supposed said future tenant will also get equity?

Have you consulted with a lawyer about this? The laws differ from place to place, but I’d be worried the equity you give him may also grant him some sort of claim on the house, which would mean he gets a say on financial things related to the real estate. This can complicate things in the future.

Also - what does “percentage of revenue if we end up keeping and paying it off years later” mean? That after he leaves you will pay him for his share in your house?

If he thinks something doesn’t matter just because the people involved are dead, maybe history is not the right academic field for him.

XML is good for markup. The problem is that people too often confuse “markup” and “serialization”.

Yup that’s what I mean.

Seems like a reasonable limitation then (not that the entire business model of scientific journals is reasonable in the 21st century is reasonable - just this specific limitation). The journal’s theme is proprietary, but the paper’s authors still have the LaTeX source so they can just slap a free preamble on it and publish it with that.

So basically the article you are allowed to release can have its typesetting - it just can’t have the journal’s preamble/theme?

or even sometimes the peer-reviewed, but NOT typeset article

What does that mean? The LaTeX source?

You are assuming here that I know what I want. What if there is no obviously correct answer, and even in the Everett branch that generates the optimal content for the file I’ll still think it can be improved and tell it to destroy the universe?

What if there is no correct answer?

I just use this:

#!/bin/bash

keep_generating=1
while [[ $keep_generating == 1 ]]; do
    dd if=/dev/random of=$1 bs=1 count=$2 status=none
    echo Contents of $1 are:
    cat $1
    echo
    read -p "Try generating again? " -s -n1 answer
    while true; do
        case $answer in
            [Yy] )
                echo
                break
                ;;
            [Nn] )
                keep_generating=0
                break
                ;;
            *)
        esac
        read -s -n1 answer
    done
done

We really should stop killing dragonflies for usage in the stained glass industry.

Or maybe they just don’t want to take the risk? https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/apr/29/five-people-killed-in-south-east-texas-shooting-cleveland

I don’t speak the language, but my guess is that the Portuguese equivalent of “beating a dead horse” uses a dog instead?