• zzz@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Amazon may be monopolistic, but I have access to more products through from different brand names than I do through the rest of the local multinational chains.

    That’s the core issue, I think.

    Amazon might be the first major case of monopolistic tendencies where the firm’s behavior hasn’t been obviously disadvantageous (or obvious it will be in the not so distant future) to the consumers from the getgo. So you’d effectively be regulating and banning towards a worse consumer experience, as of now…

    • InternetTubes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      A good analogue might be the taxi industry, which has fostered an industry accustomed to misleading its clients through a number of means because of an outdated means of charging for fares. In some countries, they require special licenses, and they’ve forced restrictions on companies like Uber and who can work for them. It’s a case of new industries versus the old ones, and once Uber made it through, they also paved the way for their alternatives.

      It’s sort of the same with Amazon and e-commerce, except Amazon has much more cash flow available due to the reasons you’ve discussed. Traditional multinational chains say they are threatened, but maybe they should be and should consider innovating and letting the consumer experience they should expect be put into law.