With the number of people concerned about privacy, it is a wonder why chrome is even popular.

  • potustheplant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    They literally got to the point in the first sentence. The point was that the article wasn’t about the browser, it was about the search engine. If you’d actually read it you’d also know that the author was also wrong in several aspects and updated it with corrections.

    • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The point was that the article wasn’t about the browser, it was about the search engine.

      Finally someone got to the point.

      If you’d actually read it you’d also know that the author was also wrong in several aspects and updated it with corrections.

      I don’t use Brave in any form. I don’t care about any of it. Just thought it was ridiculous that the commentator spent the whole post rambling without ever actually saying why it didn’t effect the person.

        • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You are aware that as a user of Brave it doesn’t affect you?

          That does not get to the point of the comment. It makes a claim. The point of the comment was about the information of being why it doesn’t effect someone being in the article and then they never actually say why. They just ramble for a paragraph leaving everyone to wonder what the point of that rambling was.

    • jtk@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is this some kind of weird trick to get people to read the article? It’s not about the search engine at all. The title would be completely brain dead if it was.