• justhach@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    How about we start at home like, I dunno, actually punishing the people responsible for the opioid epidemic (Purdue, the Sacklers, etc.)

      • gornar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Pfft and get rid of legal in-the-constitution slavery and harm for-profit prison’s income? No way!

    • pensivepangolin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because the Sacklers pay our politicians.

      Also because we totally won when the Sacklers’ business entities had to pay a fine but left the people themselves…still rich beyond reason and at liberty.

    • kitonthenet@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The right tenor is about fighting corruption and organized crime with financial reform, and sanctions relating to money laundering and manufacture is exactly that

  • NotSpez@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    weird how it works By the way, it’s not that I am pro-China on this one. Just weird how it all goes.

  • tallwookie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I personally feel that we should do nothing. maintaining the status quo in regards to international trade is far more crucial than some junkies ODing, regardless of which cartel is importing the drugs

    • t0lo@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think that sometimes but a lot of opioid addicts started as patients receiving legitimate treatment for things such as car crashes and back injuries with poor off-ramping practices