• Maharashtra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Too bad.

    Was he fined 10 times the car was worth and forbidden from driving anything more complicated than a lawnmower for a decade?

    • Technoguyfication@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      101
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      “Let’s just fine the guy about a million dollars and make him unable to get to work for the next ten years because he hit the tree with his side mirror”

      You’re fucking unhinged if you think that’s even remotely a reasonable take. I get this community is about decreasing our reliance on cars but that doesn’t give you a pass to be an insufferable piss baby when you get upset about something.

      That driver isn’t single-handedly responsible for our car dependent society, so stop acting like they are and direct your frustrations somewhere more healthy.

      • jmsw22@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        76
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s a reasonable point in here somewhere, but you’ve ruined it somewhat by being unable to engage in reasonable discourse. Dial back the adolescent insults and you might find people give a little more respect to your opinion, and maybe we’ll all learn something.

        • whatever@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Exactly my point for downvoting them. Make an argument, but better take your anger out of it and try to avoid making assumptions - you don’t know if OP-commenter really thinks that this is a reasonable take or an exaggeration to make a point about car-brains getting away with stuff.

        • Technoguyfication@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The comment I replied to wasn’t “engaging in reasonable discourse” either. You’re right that it was inappropriate to call the commenter a piss baby, but I didn’t have any expectation of a conversation either.

      • dedale@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think we shouldn’t justify antisocial behaviour.
        Now,to who the fuck thought drive through sequoias were a good idea?

  • DominicHillsun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean, it makes it sound like he crashed into the tree. He scrapped his car mirror off into the tree. Dumb but that tree has seen a lot worse, stop with the damn clickbait

    • G32@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The driver is an idiot, but then there was the guy who thought it was a good idea to build a road through that tree.

        • sky@codesink.io
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          try looking at the name of the community you’re commenting in loooool

            • VeganPizza69 Ⓥ@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              as there are plenty of real problems with cars to talk about.

              Cars and car infrastructure is ruining various natural areas, the ones that are left, and most semi-natural ones on land. Cars and car roads are the first wounds in intact land ecosystems, they make room for infection that ruins habitats.

              Do you want some reading? I have a bunch of nice peer-reviewed articles on how cars need to fuck off from wild and semi-wild areas.

  • astropenguin5@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    I feel like something like this should have a steel structure the same shape or a little smaller on either side so that if a dumbass like this tries to get through with too big of a car they just damage the car not the tree. Kinda like those things before parking garages or drive thoughs for height, but on the sides

    • Mishmash2000@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Or, what if we just don’t drive through trees at all?! Like, walk through, bike through, but not drive through. This living tree looks like it has been carved out more than it originally naturally was to specifically accommodate cars?! This munter didn’t just gently scrape their wing mirror, they tore it almost completely off by grinding it against the interior of the tree!? Fuck cars! And fuck this specific car and its owners! I hope they enjoy their repair bill!

      • astropenguin5@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I was more of thinking a little ways from the tree, but on the tree would look cooler

        Also maybe make it pointy so it would shear off excess material to make a tree-hole-shaped-car lol

  • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The only thing damaged was the passenger side mirror. I’m sure it happens all the time there.

  • Anonymoose@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    I love how everyone here is more or less on the same side but still kicking each other in the shins what the appropriate level of anger is.