• some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        1 year ago

        My company did the same. We had a six week assessment period where everyone was required to come in two days per week. Once that data showed no major difference in output, we got a smaller office (for receiving and such) and everyone was told the office is optional. Smart business that kept people happy.

      • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        This right here.

        Find me a company deeply invested in office real estate (in particular, expecting a return on that real estate), and I’ll show you a company against remote work.

        The real detriments don’t exist. True, I have met workers that don’t like remote work: companies have latched on to those people as an excuse to continue what is otherwise an entirely transparent narrative.

        If anything I gain productivity by working from home. I see companies that don’t support that kind of work as entirely being behind the curve.

      • HubertManne@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Mine was a bit hesitant but they are now talking seriously about getting rid of more offices and they had done one pass on that before. I would sorta like them to have an office subscription

  • OutrageousUmpire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    110
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “We’re not going to make that decision because we’re pandering to employees”

    Is there such a thing as “pandering to employees”? The employees are doing the real work to keep the company going, while Dimon’s work apparently includes appearing on news stations ridiculing said employees.

    Hopefully the next headline we hear about J.P. Morgan will be a mass voluntary attrition.

    • Boozilla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is the ONLY thing they listen to. If you want to work from home and your employer doesn’t let you, it’s time to quit.

      I have nothing bad to say about people who prefer going in to the office. I respect your preference and I understand it is necessary for some positions. You are valuable, too, and there’s plenty of places that would love to have you.

      There’s room in this work world for both types of jobs. It’s not an either-or choice.

      Anyone who can WFH and wants to WFH should be allowed to do so, full stop.

      • Lamy@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I just want to interject that more people could probably be successful small business owners if they wanted to, instead of just getting another job. Small business also usually benefit humans more than corporations.

        • derf82@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          We need universal healthcare. That is the stopping point for many. People done see how they can guarantee healthcare if they start a business. I really think a huge part of the lobbying against universal healthcare is large businesses knowing it prevents competition.

            • derf82@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              It is expensive, and in a lean month for a new business, you might not afford it. Many, especially people with kids or chronic illness can’t take that risk.

              Also, that doesn’t speak to hiring employees. Larger companies offering health insurance puts small businesses at a huge competitive disadvantage.

    • Spaceman Spiff@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Go ahead and queue up the shocked Pikachu face when they do. Average is something like 30% of people being told to return to office will instead resign, across all industries.

  • Num10ck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    1 year ago

    never had a good experience dealing with Chase, I guess leadership feels the same for the employees?

  • 857@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s OK, I didn’t have any desire to work for that asshole anyway…

    Most folks are exponentially more productive when they don’t have to waste hours of their day (stressfully) driving/public transit from A to B just to do their job.

    • EnderWi99in@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      1 year ago

      I am way more productive when I’m not also being constantly interrupted by the people around me all day long. When I sit down to work at home I will go hours without even looking up from my screen. When my attention is interrupted in the office, which happens regularly, it takes me a good 5-7min to focus again. Repeat that same process a couple times an hour and not a lot gets done.

      • lobut@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        I can’t believe how much time I waste in the office. It’s unbelievable. I will say that certain meetings in the office are better. However, maybe a day or so for those but for the most part. It’s such a waste.

    • sadreality@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah but have you thought about this Boomer’s CRE clients/friends? What about his origination business?

      You are insensitive… why do you hate freedom and holy profit of another man who works very hard for every penny.

        • Juvyn00b@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Jesus Christ - if she would have left the last minute of that out, it could have been very motivational. Instead…yeeeeshhh

          • Gellis12@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, she caught a ton of flak for it online, and then gave a total non-apology that basically boiled down to an officespeak version of “sorry you’re so sensitive”

        • Nioxic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          A lot of furniture companies sell to other companies, office equipment etc

          Its super expensive(overpriced) and if nobody uses offices anymore they will go out of business.

          Herman miller chairs? I mean, theyre great but not a lot of orivate cotizens buy them.

  • supratachophobia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 year ago

    The reality is that Jaime Dimon is out of touch. On last year’s employee conference call, he was asked about return to office and how WFH has opened up significant flexibility for employees personal lives, specifically, children’s doctors appointments. He responded that your nanny should be taking the kids to your kids doctor’s appointments so you can work at the office.

  • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    So he’s going to limit his talent pool to people who both live within commuting distance and aren’t good enough at their jobs to find remote work.

    That’s a bold choice.

  • DebraBucket@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Pay people during their commutes, they “clock in” as soon as they get into their cars and “clock out” only when they get home.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That rewards employees for living as far away from the office as possible. Is that a fair thing to do? I seriously don’t know.

      • Brainsploosh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not rewards, incentivises, means the employer has a larger labor pool to pick from, which in capitalism is good.

      • DebraBucket@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Does it? You are still working the same hours, it’s just that you are spending some of those hours driving. I suppose if you like driving more than your actual job? On the other hand, it makes your labor more expensive, and thus you are less competitive if other people happen to work closer. Why pay someone 8 hours of pay for 4 hours of work when you can pay someone 8 hours of pay for 8 hours of work, either because they live next door or they work remotely?

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, but he’s not at his summer house, where he could be working from and maybe be less productive. So that’s almost the same thing.