San Francisco protestors are disabling autonomous vehicles using traffic cones
www.techspot.com
Safe Streets Rebel's protest comes after automatic vehicles were blamed for incidents including crashing into a bus and running over a dog. City officials in June said...

Safe Streets Rebel’s protest comes after automatic vehicles were blamed for incidents including crashing into a bus and running over a dog. City officials in June said…

    • xavier666@lemm.eeEnglish
      6·
      1 year ago

      You mean those companies who will lobby and spend a fraction of their wealth to make those lawsuits disappear?

        • xavier666@lemm.eeEnglish
          6·
          1 year ago

          It’s no different at all. We should have stronger laws for such scenarios.

            • rambaroo@lemmy.worldEnglish
              1·
              1 year ago

              Uh, because software can be fixed and those deaths can be prevented? How the hell can you ask this question seriously? I can’t believe how many people are willing to blatantly shill for these companies, even if it gets people fucking killed.

              And no you can’t claim to be saving lives because these driverless cars very often kill people in situations that a human driver would easily navigate.

            • xavier666@lemm.eeEnglish
              21·
              1 year ago

              Why are we willing to say that it is unacceptable that no computer can kill people on the road when almost 43,000 die in the USA due to humans driving?

              This part is bogus to me as well. My friend who used to work in self-driving said that when self driving can be “just” better than human driving, technology has won. In statistical terms, it means having slightly lesser fatalities than humans (<43k fatalities with respect to the num of human drivers).

              Now it’s up for debate lesser by how much exactly. Just 5% reduction or 50% reduction. If we want to go for 99% reduction, we should stop building self-driving tech altogether.