• usbpc@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    When you tinker and debug something on windows, you usually have little idea of what went wrong and can derive very little from the experience. At least that was the case back when I still used windows, in the XP and vista days.

    I don’t think that is completely fair, I feel like the reason is more that on Linux no easy to follow “solutions” to as many problems as on Windows exist. When you have a problem on Linux you most of the time have to dive deeply into the technical details. On windows it’s often enough to search for a solution on the internet and follow the first tutorial (not the stupid SEO garbage sites). And once whatever problem you had is gone you don’t go and try to understand why the solution worked.

    That also really annoyed me a lot when I had to fix Windows problems for work, because I really like to understand why something is working or not. And after some research I actually found Sysinternals which are tools that help you dig deeper into Windows inner workings. There are also some wonderful videos on how to use those tools available by the author of those tools. And there are also books available both on how to troubleshoot with the tools and on how Windows internally works.

    Edit: fiexd tyops ;)

    • MetaCubed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      As someone who works on both daily

      Linux forces allows you to go elbow deep in research and application of a fix to truly understand what change is being made

      Windows (by default) allows forces you to apply some bandages and paint unless you have and know how to use the third party tools (for the purposes of this comparison I’m ignoring regedit, compmgmt, WMIC, others)