I don’t understand why Google didn’t just made Android closed source. They would’ve made custom roms impossible and therefore more able to control and spy on it’s users. Why did Google made Android open source, while Microsoft’s Windows is still closed source to this day?

  • Yubishi@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Doesn’t this contradict GPL? Since Android was built on top of the Linux kernel.

    • minorninth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No. The GPL for Linux applies to the Linux kernel.

      GPL only says that one particular program has to stay open. It doesn’t say that everything else on the same computer has to be GPL.

      Most Linux distros include software with a wide variety of licensed. Many people run commercial software on top of Linux.