Striker@lemmy.worldM to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoMusk is undeniably just trying to run twitter into the ground at this point.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square748fedilinkarrow-up14.33Karrow-down1172
arrow-up14.16Karrow-down1imageMusk is undeniably just trying to run twitter into the ground at this point.lemmy.worldStriker@lemmy.worldM to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square748fedilink
minus-squaredragontamer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·1 year agoIt’s not tweets you read. It’s tweets your web browser / app reads. Your web browser goes through 600 tweets in just 2 minutes of scrolling, maybe less.
minus-squareSlitted@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoThat seems like something that should have been found during initial testing. Unless of course, they didn’t test at all.
minus-squareTheGeneral@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·1 year agoPlus let’s be real anyone with a decent scraper isn’t gonna not the limit (will just switch accounts).
minus-squareTheGeneral@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·1 year agoPlus let’s be real anyone with a decent scraper isn’t gonna not the limit (will just switch accounts).
minus-squareTheGeneral@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·1 year agoPlus let’s be real anyone with a decent scraper isn’t gonna not the limit (will just switch accounts).
It’s not tweets you read. It’s tweets your web browser / app reads.
Your web browser goes through 600 tweets in just 2 minutes of scrolling, maybe less.
That seems like something that should have been found during initial testing. Unless of course, they didn’t test at all.
Plus let’s be real anyone with a decent scraper isn’t gonna not the limit (will just switch accounts).
Plus let’s be real anyone with a decent scraper isn’t gonna not the limit (will just switch accounts).
Plus let’s be real anyone with a decent scraper isn’t gonna not the limit (will just switch accounts).