• Tangent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Even if it’s not illegal it sure as hell makes their hypocrisy rather glaring doesn’t it?

  • WhiteTiger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Moreover, recent changes in Reddit’s policy towards its moderators, along with its claim of ownership over the subreddits, could potentially destabilize the company’s legal standing. This could potentially raise questions about the company’s legal standing.

    Is this the first draft of a high school report?

  • CaptObvious@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Haven’t they jeopardized their Section 230 status by asserting control of subreddits, exercising editorial privilege, and by posting material to the platform at their own initiative (reinstating posts that users have deleted)?

  • Xero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I didn’t know forcefully editing users’ comments and restoring their posts and comments without their consent is legal

  • EnglishMobster@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    About halfway through this starts reading like ChatGPT. I don’t disagree with the premise, but I do wonder if a human wrote this article…