• Adub@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Then we also don’t know if the action is just temporary to just remedy a problem before IPO or a serious consideration. Rolling it out quickly is moronic too because what about smaller subs & targeted harassment.

      • techno156@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        It might also cause some interesting problems.

        What happens if a sub votes out all the moderators of a sub, before there are any new ones?

        Could they remove Reddit devs from /r/Reddit or /r/Reddit.com? Being admins, they could probably just put themselves back on, but the imagery of them being forced off their own sub is a little funny.

        • Helium@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Pretty obvious that these tools only apply to dissenting subs… after this all blows over, there won’t be a single reddit employee even looking at this system

          • hobocat@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            They even explicitly stated that!

            If there are mods here who are willing to work towards reopening this community, we are willing to work with you to process a Top Mod Removal request or reorder the mod team to achieve this goal if mods higher up the list are hindering reopening. We would handle this request and any retaliation attempts here in this modmail chain immediately.

            This system is being implemented for the sole purpose of kicking out mods that are keeping subs private. It’s absolutely retaliatory. There’s no chance that they maintain this system as an actual long-term change to reddit’s mod removal policies. It would be too much overhead to staff.