I love playing with packet, and I love playing with APRS. So how do I decide?

There’s quite a bit of both packet and APRS activity in the area. I don’t want to put up another antenna at the moment because funds won’t allow, otherwise I’d get another cheap 2m rig for APRS.

On packet, I occasionally check in with other hams and send messages. I mostly keep it running because my webmap at packetradiomap.com uses my radio to map locally received stations. I could modify the webmap to not use my radio though.

I feel running an APRS station is more “useful” though, as my area isn’t covered very well by iGates or digipeaters.

So if you had to choose, would you go full time APRS or packet?

  • K0STK@lemmy.radio
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Do what ever “scratches your itch”. The choices of random internet users aren’t applicable to your situation.

    In our area both “modes” are effectively dead. There are two packet nodes and no meaningful traffic. And APRS is full of position reports from repeater objects and DV hotspots; we don’t use APRS for anything … no messaging, no event support, etc.

    It’s all quite sadly pointless. The luddites in our club are not interested in anything more than working DX and oversharing on repeater nets.

    • minorsecond@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do what ever “scratches your itch”

      That’s the problem, lol. They both do, and both modes are popular here. I’m thinking of actually just going ahead and putting up another antenna and seeing what happens with the neighbors. No HOA or anything, so I think it’ll be ok.

      Sucks that you don’t have packet there. It’s very fun to play with.