WhiskeyOaks [none/use name]@hexbear.netcake to History@hexbear.netEnglish · 1 year agoI'm Curioushexbear.netimagemessage-square230linkfedilinkarrow-up181arrow-down19file-text
arrow-up172arrow-down1imageI'm Curioushexbear.netWhiskeyOaks [none/use name]@hexbear.netcake to History@hexbear.netEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square230linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-square∞ 🏳️⚧️Edie [it/its, she/her, fae/faer, love/loves, ze/hir, des/pair, none/use name, undecided]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up22·1 year agoBut what if the extremes of reason are the start and the end, and the correct position is in the middle of that
minus-squareCowbee [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up32·edit-21 year agoI mean, the correct stance need not be bound to abstract spatial relations of stances
minus-square∞ 🏳️⚧️Edie [it/its, she/her, fae/faer, love/loves, ze/hir, des/pair, none/use name, undecided]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·7 months agoWhat was I even thinking about… Oh right, reasoning is a process. You start somewhere, reason and reach a conclusion, so the middle of that is just stopping part way through the reasoning, never reaching a conclusion.
minus-squareCowbee [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·7 months agoOh yea, makes sense!
But what if the extremes of reason are the start and the end, and the correct position is in the middle of that
I mean, the correct stance need not be bound to abstract spatial relations of stances
What was I even thinking about… Oh right, reasoning is a process. You start somewhere, reason and reach a conclusion, so the middle of that is just stopping part way through the reasoning, never reaching a conclusion.
Oh yea, makes sense!