• CyborgMarx [any, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    15 hours ago

    French capital is not investing for the sake of Viet rail and the wild returns that would bring in

    This is quid pro quo under the table deal making and graft, the French are purchasing access to something they think will make real money and definitely something they shouldn’t have access to

    • Southern Boy@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I mean feel free to back any of that up but it really just seems like bong rip paranoia that flies in the face of how these cooperation agreements work and the competition and diplomatic pressure France is facing

      Capital outflows from imperialist countries have not created rail development abroad beyond what was needed to extract resources for a century in many places so imperialists paying for infrastructure is symbolically a reversal, it’s bringing them to heel

      • CyborgMarx [any, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Capital outflows from imperialist countries have not created rail development abroad beyond what was needed to extract resources for a century in many places so imperialists paying for infrastructure is symbolically a reversal, it’s bringing them to heel

        That’s my point, the French wouldn’t pay for infrastructure unless they thought they were getting something out of it, if there’s a clear reversal (symbolic or otherwise) the French wouldn’t so much as return Hanoi’s calls

        Obviously the French see a door that is open or appears to be open, a door that most likely has nothing to do with rail (considering the comically low amount they’re investing) and shouldn’t be open to begin with

        Whether that “door” is actually open and the Vietnamese aren’t just playing 4d chess on Paris is up for debate, I hope they are