• hexaflexagonbear [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    2 days ago

    My favourite “civ is woke now” argument is that district placement emphasizes the local geography’s influence on your civilization, which is marxist and woke. And like… how the fuck were you playing civ before? Even without civ VI forcing you to be more mindful of it geography is obviously always huge in a 4X. It’s literally the first 3 Xs! And it’s the 4th X in any game with remotely interesting combat.

    • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 days ago

      Could you help me try to understand how district placement emphasizing the local geography’s influence on a civilization is somehow woke? I can’t make the connection at all. If you’ve seen that take, could you elaborate?

      • hexaflexagonbear [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        They think the idea that geography and/or climate can shape a civilization is woke. Their idea is that civilizations and culture are something that I guess exists a priori as “good” or “bad”, and “developed” or “undeveloped”. The very idea that a bad crop yield or lack of local resources can shape how a society develops apparently contradicts with the reactionary worldview.

    • keepcarrot [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      Silly Marxist, history is about who believes hardest in the idea of race and the nation and brings it into being. Everyone else loses and has their stuff taken from them, and rightly so.