FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 9 hours agoI know writers who use subtext and they're all cowards.hexbear.netimagemessage-square18fedilinkarrow-up1131arrow-down10
arrow-up1131arrow-down1imageI know writers who use subtext and they're all cowards.hexbear.netFunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 9 hours agomessage-square18fedilink
minus-squareFunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.netOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·9 hours agoThe negation of the negation is distinct from the original phenomenon, so the negation of text being subtext and the negation of subtext being cop passive language implies that it is actually “domtext”
minus-squarefrauddogg [they/them, null/void]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·8 hours ago…Damn! Y’know you on some quantum shit right now
The negation of the negation is distinct from the original phenomenon, so the negation of text being subtext and the negation of subtext being cop passive language implies that it is actually “domtext”
…Damn! Y’know you on some quantum shit right now