Edit: @Successful_Try543@feddit.org solved it. It says “one special character”. Not “at least one”.

  • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 days ago

    Correct, hence the sentence after the one you quoted :)

    If any service can recover your password and send it back to you rather than just resetting it for you to set a new one, don’t rely on that service for anything you want to keep secure. And certainly don’t reuse a password there, though you shouldn’t be reusing passwords anyways because who knows what they are and aren’t storing, even if they don’t offer password recovery.

    • NotAnonymousAtAll@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      Sorry, didn’t want this to look like an attack or disagreement. Just wanted to highlight that point, because arbitrary maximum sizes for passwords are a pet peeve of mine.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 days ago

        Yeah no worries and agreed. I hate seeing commercial sites using worse password sanitization practices than I used for my first development website that wasn’t even really intended for anyone else to log in to and any max length suggests the password is either stored or processed in plaintext.

        IMO it should even be hashed on the client side before being sent so that it doesn’t show up as plaintext in any http requests or logs. Then salted and hashed again server side before being stored (or checked for login).