• blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    1 month ago

    With the stuff about ‘super computers’, this seems more like a shitpost than a science meme.

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I mean, you can just google “pringles super computers” They did use a supercomputer in modeling the thing, most articles are useless cuz they’re not going to go into details about how or why.

          or here’s a CNN article about it. the blurb is just

          “Pringles potato chips are designed using [supercomputing] capabilities – to assess their aerodynamic features so that on the manufacturing line they don’t go flying off the line,” said Dave Turek, vice president of deep computing at IBM. Personally, though, you’re missing out on this gem

          Keep in mind, pringles were around since 1968, apparently. modeling and simulating dynamic airflow was probably barely in it’s infancy. (and even to day, computational fluid dynamics is some exceedingly hard math to rock)

          • prenatal_confusion@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Thanks for the reply! Yes sure and I did that but was a bit irked that the link you posted as a source for information regarding the supercomputing was (sorry) useless.

            Anyways thanks for caring :)

            Cheers

  • LNRDrone@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    Somehow they also designed them so the tube goes stale roughly 2 minutes after opening it. Also the lovely texture reminiscent of sawdust. Truly a marvel of engineering.

    • M137@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      72
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t think you’re supposed to eat the tube, shouldn’t matter that it goes stale.

    • smeg@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      “Once you pop you can’t stop” is actually a warning about this

  • Ephera@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Personally, it always decreased satisfaction that it breaks unpredictably, because I’d get crumbs everywhere. In particular, the shape also hinders putting them far enough into your mouth to catch the crumbs.
    Definitely prefer chips which are just sliced potatoes. Them being a naturally grown structure makes them unpredictable enough for my taste.

  • CloutAtlas [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Pringles aren’t legally chips because they’re made from mashed potato dough (as opposed to slices of potato), hence why marketing calls them crisps even in the US.

  • arin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 month ago

    Also abot 10-15% of thr chips crumble at the bottom to cushion the rest of the pringles

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 month ago

    This meme is wrong and likely based on a Reddit post that is itself wrong.

    “TIL that in the '50s P&G used a supercomputer for designing Pringles…”

    The only source I found referencing pringles association with a supercomputer was a 2007 article with this sentence:

    Pringles potato chips are designed using [supercomputing] capabilities – to assess their aerodynamic features so that on the manufacturing line they don’t go flying off the line," said Dave Turek, vice president of deep computing at IBM.)

    Pringle’s didn’t exist until 1968. Why would they waste a decade’s worth of supercomputing time (per the Reddit post that they were designed in the “‘50s using a supercomputer”) to design a potato chip?

    It does not state that the chips were designed in ‘68 with a supercomputer. It directly states that “today’s supercomputers”…”are creating potato chips”, so their current design was done that way for the purposes of expedited manufacturing processes.

    The Reddit posts even links to the article stating that the reference for supercomputer usage in Pringle’s design is modern.

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        I developed it. I did not invent it. That was done by a German gentlemen whose name I’ve forgotten for years. I developed the machine that cooks them. He had invented the basic idea, how to make the potato dough, pressing it between two forms, more or less as in a wrap-around, immersing them in hot cooking oil, and so forth and so on. And we were then called in, I was in the engineering development division, and asked to develop mass production equipment to make these chips. And we divided the task into the dough making/dough rolling portion, which was done by Len Hooper, and the cooking portion, which was done by me, and then the pickoff and salting portion, which was done by someone else, and then the can filling/can sealing portion which was done by a man who was almost driven insane by the program. Because he would develop a machine, and he would have it almost ready to go, and they would say “Oh, instead of 300 cans a minute, make it 500 cans a minute.” And so he would have to throw out a bunch of stuff, and develop the new machine, and when he got that one about ready, they’d say “make it 700 cans a minute.” And they almost put him in a mental hospital. He took his job very seriously and he just about flipped out.

        So no mention of a supercomputer in this invention story.

    • xthexder@l.sw0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      That actually makes way more sense why a supercomputer was involved. (Keeping in mind, our phones are likely more powerful than what they are talking about)

      Edit: Oh, it’s worse than I thought. The CRAY-1 supercomputer is 4.5x slower than a Raspberry Pi.

  • sundray@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    I remember reading somewhere that they also deliberately put different amounts of flavorant on each side of the chip so that you can choose to have more or less flavor intensity based on which side you place against your tongue.

    • StereoTrespasser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      If by deliberate you mean the sprayers that spray all the artificial flavors, liquefied added nutrients, and related shit are on top of the “chip” as it moves down a conveyor, then sure I guess it’s deliberate.

      • sundray@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        lol, well it was Pringles propaganda, so I’m sure they were trying to make themselves look like they spared no expense “engineering” their snack food. 😆

      • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Which sucks because right way up it fits perfectly around your tongue so it’s very easy to eat. But if you want the flavor, you gotta flip it over and it’s harder to completely cover it with your mouth, resulting in crumbs flying everywhere.

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    They should be smaller though, so they fit in one piece into the mouth withouth hurting yourself.