• AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 months ago

    I hope their claims are true, because I’m sick of the duopoly in desktop CPUs.

  • utopiah@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    Because it’s a race I wish such articles would bring forward comparison points :

    • benchmark allowing to pinpoint past equivalents
    • when was the first equivalent actually put on sale (and where)
    • what’s the volume produced, even if only an order of magnitude
    • inflation adjusted (as it might be several year gap) price comparison

    otherwise it mostly feels like tech-propaganda pieces.

    • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Agreed, but their entire fab process was stolen via corporate espionage and is not a novel design in any way.

      • istanbullu@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        According to Americans every success the Chinese have is stolen. Because in their racist world view, Americans can’t comprehend non-Americans succeeding in anything.

      • monobot@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I haven’t seen anything about that in the article, I would like to see some text about it. Especially from whom?

        Especially since they use MIPS architecture while Intel and AMD x86 are CISC. So… probably not the whole process?

        On the other hand, even if true, China doesn’t have same view on what “original” means as we in the west have. Vase made in the same way as in 16th century is “original 16th century vase”. Different culture.

  • realitista@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Are these chips actually made in China or still made in Taiwan like most high performance chips?