The reality on Harris is that she is the perfect liberal candidate for your average vote blue Democrat. For most of the electorate it’s all about aesthetics. Joe’s campaign was mostly aesthetics, Sweet Ol’ Grampa Joe here to bring tough love and common sense. Hers will be the same.

She’s a cop, facing down a criminal, she’s a girl boss (the KHive is buzzing), she’s a mother, she’s an ally, shes “youthful”, she’s the perfect surrogate for the corporate Dem platform. We arrived here due to a multitude of factors. Not the least the uncommitted vote in the primary and the low turnout for states that had them. The debate simply finished the equation that was already looking bad for Joe.

The mass movement to vote uncommitted was never going to manifest into a principled stance that would follow through to the election. The solidarity vote will dry up now that biden is out. People who voted uncommitted will feel unburdened, knowing now they can vote blue no matter who in November, regardless of the actual policy slate. They did their part, the time for critical thought is over. People who are apathetic will feel energized by change, and feel less inclined to doom scroll. Any dissenting opinion will be ignored, as the “adults in the room” already did their part getting Biden out, regardless of how valid the criticisms of Harris are. We’re back to our regularly scheduled program, where you better get in line or be the heel.

I think the typical “well meaning” democrat lib sees this as the light at the end of the tunnel. They will be able to put blinders on until November. Whatever momentum was gained for the left through principled action, organizing, and agitation will see these fair weather allies evaporate. Harris might have an equivalent stance on geopolitics to Joe, she might not, but the electorate will not entertain a second referendum on the matter. Been there, done that, this is the most important election of our lives sweety, time to vote.

  • EelBolshevikism [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    friends and family are back on the damage reduction voting train. I don’t know how to feel about this. They seem genuinely scared of Vance getting into office. It feels callous to dismiss them even though I know Harris or any other Democrat is just as bad as any Republican, just with varying degrees of subtlety. It feels worse to capitulate to them considering we’re talking about tacitly endorsing genocide by approving of Biden’s murder-butcher line when it comes to innocent Palestine people and sending money to idf-cool . So I’m stuck on how to even react. Do I just endorse their decision so they can be more radicalized when Harris does nothing good?

    • RedWizard [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think the thing that will really push some people is if Harris loses (a coin flip IMO) or Harris wins, but the supreme court remains unchanged after 4 years (barring death) and there is zero movement on reproductive rights. The contradiction will come to a head at that point. A woman in office, who gets nothing done on reproductive rights, should be a fracturing moment for the Democratic Party. Hard to say though.