• Chronicon [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      as people in the replies to Stancil (linked by Parsani below) mention, the CPI adjustment is based on overall inflation, not inflation of restaurant prices specifically, so it’s still flawed IMO since I believe restaurant (especially fast food) price inflation significantly outpaces overall inflation.

    • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      19 days ago

      Even adjusting for inflation, it’s common to raise prices to increase revenue (consumer expenditures). There are business people all over the world right now drawing up graphs of how much total revenue they can generate at different price points, and low price/mass sales is not a good approach for many companies.

      This is an important point, because prices are set largely by what people are willing to pay, not costs + whatever margin a company picks, for example. Tons of right-wing media pretends industry does rudimentary cost + margin pricing to push talking points like “if our business has to pay one cent more in taxes or wages that will ultimately be paid by consumers,” which is preposterous theoretically and has been disproven by real data over and over.

      • hexaflexagonbear [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        19 days ago

        not costs + whatever margin a company picks

        Basically: sale price is determined by what company thinks maximizes overall profit, cost of product (including shrink) determines whether the product is carried at all. It’s something I bring up in the shoplifting debate a lot, as people assume it increases price of individual items. Of course shrink plays a role when businesses make decisions, but why would a business charge you less than you’re willing to pay for an item?