Shared December 31, 2022
00:00 - Intro
01:26 - Introduction of akkoma
01:44 - Setup VPS for akkoma
03:27 - Initial Linux hardening
07:50 - Prepare environment for akkoma
13:21 - Install akkoma
20:02 - Configure Ingress for akkoma
22:36 - Installing frontend for akkoma
24:58 - Creating user in akkoma
25:31 - Following user in fediverse
26:20 - Admin panel in akkoma
27:15 - Switching off registration
27:50 - Federation & Publicity
30:00 - Disable Known Timeline for anon users
30:48 - Black listing instances from Federation
Akkoma seems to be indeed the best Mastodon alternative for self-hosting right now, although with things changing quickly during this time, who knows if this is still true next month :)
It is indeed what I’m running these days. Loving it. It is like someone has made a “paper cuts”-list of Pleroma and then “just fixed it”, and then added small sweet little things that make for better usability. Great stuff. Made me finally sort out a Liberapay account so I could show my support in ways that matter.
Can you list some of the differences between pleroma and akkoma? I know they removed the shoutbox (which was pretty useless) and chats (which I think should be improved instead of removed).
EDIT: I’ve also seen some akkoma instances and their frontend doesn’t have some of the features that pleroma does, so it seems they’ve gone the hard fork route which is disappointing.
Firstly, this will have to be from memory of my old (actually current stable version) install of Pleroma, and things I have reacted positively on:
A lot of the rest it has inherited from Pleroma, which was good to start with. Pretty much everything can be styled (except easily changing fonts unless you wish to code) from GUI settings (I run a Dracula inspired self-styled theme). It has Misskey emojis/animations, but I don’t care (at all) about those. Quote posting is the same as in Pleroma. It has all the filter-options from Pleroma too. There is nothing in Pleroma that isn’t in Akkoma. There’s lots in Akkoma that isn’t in Pleroma.
Most importantly, compared to Mastodon and pretty much all other fediverse micro-blogging services: it dynamically shows the contents in all threads, and on profiles. If it doesn’t have the stuff you are looking at (say, a profile), it runs off to get it for you, and within a couple of seconds it has populated that profile, instead of staying empty (like on Mastodon, Misskey, Calckey etc). The same goes for threads: it goes out to collect replies from people even if you haven’t seen them (or, their instances) before, instead of staying empty/invisible (like on Mastodon/Calckey). So…“proper” Federation.
But yeah, something like that. :)
Hah, forgot to say: Yes, the shoutbox and chat was removed. As I run an instance-of-one in any case I don’t miss them.
Also, Akkoma dev has made friends with the Glitch-social people and so the “advanced” Mastodon-fe is updated and available again. It doesn’t have all the bells and whistles in functionality from Akkomas pleroma-fe though. Also, for those inclined, there is a soapbox-fe too. I don’t run it so don’t know much about it, other than that it looks simplistic and nice, but I prefer pleroma-fe (in Akkomas version) so haven’t tried it.
Thanks for all that info. Maybe the akkoma instance I was looking at was broken or had patches that changed features around.
That sounds great. I hope pleroma pulls that in. The tree-view and Collapse header seem to have made it back to pleroma and they’re really useful.
Their FAQ has a section on the differences.
I think it was a good decision to remove the chat. Apparently it worked quite badly, was not supported by any other AP software and there are other protocols like xmpp or Matrix that are much better suited for private chats.
This faq? I don’t see any comparison with pleroma.
Lemmy seems to support it, though not very well. I agree xmpp or matrix are better suited for that, but ppl still want DMs and pleroma chats are a better alternative to that.
There is a comparison here too: https://akkoma.dev/AkkomaGang/akkoma/
It explains the differences and links to a more detailed explanation.
I guess you want a table listing technical differences in detail? That would make little sense as both projects are still pulling changes from each other and are in active development, especially Akkoma. So such a table would be outdated within a very short time. Look that the git change log I guess?